I picked this up a little while back. I knew it had what looked like some slight enamel damage when I bought it.
Today, whilst trying to add it to my Hanseatic display I looked a lot closer at the damage. I have a lot of Hanseatic crosses from all three states and I know when the enamel is damaged it tends to crack all the way through or a piece chips away. This does not fit that description.
This seems to have a layer of enamel that is damaged, but when you look close under magnification, the rest is perfect, it seems to almost have a separate layer on top. My images are not so good but does anyone know how these rather scarce crosses were made? It's certainly different from the normal Hanseatic cross manufacture. I could almost swear it has a "protective" layer on top, but tell me what you think.
Were these made with layer upon layer of enamel? I am really intrigued now.
Today, whilst trying to add it to my Hanseatic display I looked a lot closer at the damage. I have a lot of Hanseatic crosses from all three states and I know when the enamel is damaged it tends to crack all the way through or a piece chips away. This does not fit that description.
This seems to have a layer of enamel that is damaged, but when you look close under magnification, the rest is perfect, it seems to almost have a separate layer on top. My images are not so good but does anyone know how these rather scarce crosses were made? It's certainly different from the normal Hanseatic cross manufacture. I could almost swear it has a "protective" layer on top, but tell me what you think.
Were these made with layer upon layer of enamel? I am really intrigued now.
Comment