Hi,
I picked this one up recently but I have some questions with it. It's a brass/tombac example, measuring ~46.5 x 41.3 mm and weighing 7.7 g. It is not vaulted like my two iron examples. The hinge and main pin look spot on for an Imperial Wound Badge and both look genuinely worn.
Regarding the catch - it is very small, although the pin fits snugly into it. Has anybody seen (or own) a similar catch on an Imperial Wound Badge (Naval or otherwise)?
The finish is a bit strange - it has a firegilt effect BUT it's possible it has been refinished with a metallic gold (modelling) paint.
On the obverse (highlighted by the red arrows), you should be able to make out a buildup of "gunk" in some of the chains. The gunk is underneath the finish and appears to me metallic and hard, rather than a buildup/excess of paint (which should be soft?). This is my main concern with the badge. Obverse detail is otherwise fairly good - so is the reverse - and I think the badge is die-struck (not cast imo).
So, what do you think. Genuine, refinished or simply a repro?
All responses appreciated.
Regards
Mike K
PS: I have Hamelman's Wound Badge Book and the measurement's of this badge are at least ball-park with his Type-I & -II badges.
I picked this one up recently but I have some questions with it. It's a brass/tombac example, measuring ~46.5 x 41.3 mm and weighing 7.7 g. It is not vaulted like my two iron examples. The hinge and main pin look spot on for an Imperial Wound Badge and both look genuinely worn.
Regarding the catch - it is very small, although the pin fits snugly into it. Has anybody seen (or own) a similar catch on an Imperial Wound Badge (Naval or otherwise)?
The finish is a bit strange - it has a firegilt effect BUT it's possible it has been refinished with a metallic gold (modelling) paint.
On the obverse (highlighted by the red arrows), you should be able to make out a buildup of "gunk" in some of the chains. The gunk is underneath the finish and appears to me metallic and hard, rather than a buildup/excess of paint (which should be soft?). This is my main concern with the badge. Obverse detail is otherwise fairly good - so is the reverse - and I think the badge is die-struck (not cast imo).
So, what do you think. Genuine, refinished or simply a repro?
All responses appreciated.
Regards
Mike K
PS: I have Hamelman's Wound Badge Book and the measurement's of this badge are at least ball-park with his Type-I & -II badges.
Comment