EspenlaubMilitaria

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Soviet WW2 Defense Of Leningrad Medals: Really Close Up

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Soviet WW2 Defense Of Leningrad Medals: Really Close Up

    Robert Pierce's recent postings on Sevastapol and Odessa medals got me thinking about how picky and paranoid we have all become about fakes of Soviet awards.

    ALL the Defense, Liberation, and Capture medals are, after all, very crudely made, mass produced, and were often worn by the original recipients on a daily basis for decades-- leaving us with worn, scratched, and buffed down tired old veterans indeed!

    I find it is VERY hard to scan any of these medals:

    There is always some sort of "real color" distortion and or either reflection from whatever may be left of the original gilt finish, or "distortions" through the sort of splotchy discoloration and tarnish most of these seem to end up with.

    I personally NEVER clean any of these medals, ever:

    the brass they are made out of is already soft, and easily scratched as decades of original owner wear so often reveals. Anything used to clean will inevitably strip off whatever remnant of original finish might still be lingering in crevices. And having been buffed down often enough with whatever the Soviet version of "Brasso" was, they are already QUITE worn enough.

    There can surely not have been a SINGLE die ever made for each of these medals-- certainly not for the ones churned out by hundreds of thousands-- and I notice a what I suppose may be either a 'wearing down" of the dies from repeated use, or perhaps something as simple as insufficient or excessive pressure in the striking, because some medals with LESS detail have MORE finish--

    suggesting to me the DIE was worn BEFORE the finish was applied.

    Sometimes I think we can become TOO paranoid, and TOO nitpicky about items that are almost always, after all, mass produced by the Communist version of "lowest bid."

    If anyone would add similar scans, I have done the obverse with just enough of ring showing to tell whether it is soldered loop or shaved down, at 400% life size. Detail closeups will be at 750%, usually.

    To my knowledge, the WW2 campaign medals were NOT all centrally struck, as Orders were, in only the Moscow or Leningrad Mints. Certainly the Defense of Leningrad Medals were made DURING the 900 day siege, and were already being bestowed before the siege even ended! If any medal was ever harder earned, I don't know what it was!

    Here is Defense of Leningrad Medal #1 at 400%--

    notice that the two soldiers at far right don't have fully formed faces.
    Attached Files

    #2
    Here is a closeup at 750% of Defense of Leningrad Medal #1--

    because surface wear to the higher areas such as the central soldiers face can distort apparent "differences" in the die, the points I have chosen to zoom in on, from one medal to the next, are the ARCHWAY in the wall and the tower above that gate. Considerable wear often occurs on that spire, especially from polishing,, but the specifics I want to encourage looking at are

    1) the border of the gate arch itself-- probably the lowest background point on the medal,

    2) the row of "porthole" windows above that gate, and

    3) the line and other fine details of the spire itself.
    Attached Files

    Comment


      #3
      Defense of Leningrad Medal #2 was awarded in 1943, while the siege was still ongoing, to a senior police officer called into army service in his home city. Traces of original gilt finish twinkle in all the low, protected flat places (between the heads of the side figures, and so on) but that is difficult for me to scan in "real color."
      Attached Files

      Comment


        #4
        Defense of Leningrad Medal #2, the same closeup details of interest at 750%--

        Aside from the rust colored "pigeon dropping" tarnish above the central soldier's head, what shows here as similar "looking" tarnish and dirt around the figures and in crannies in the figures and inside the lettering is actually the BRIGHT gilt, that my scanner has rendered dull.

        Note that the spire seems less detailed, most likely from rubbing wear, yet has three distinct blocks in the top spike's base rather like a traffic light's 3 lenses, and the protected "portholes" are markedly different from the first medal shown, while the archway border is also better detailed.

        Again, NOT suggesting fake, simply pointing out tiny variations.
        Attached Files

        Comment


          #5
          Defense of Leningrad Medal #3 at 400%
          Attached Files

          Comment


            #6
            Defense of Leningrad Medal #3 same detail close up at 750%--

            Although this one has no trace of the original gilt finish, the details to the spire are sharper and clearer on this one than on the previous two--

            and yet notice how the "portholes" fade in and out?

            The edging of the archway gate, at the lowest point, is also almost nonexistent here, suggesting not post-manufacturer WEAR but STAMPING pressure or die wear variation.
            Attached Files

            Comment


              #7
              Rick,
              I am really glad to see you start this series of threads for the Soviet campaign medals. To start with, I fully agree with your assumption that there had to be more than 'one set of dies', and that all medals had to identical to the one from this die. In that case, which medal do we pick to be that one? All your points of die-wear, different dies, various mints, surface finishes, dress-wear, etc., etc. are credible issues and should be considered as we go on with this hobby and it's research. I'll post what few medals I do have to make this series a success. It should prove a good aid to any new Soviet medals collector (like myself ).

              Here are a few (4) Leningrad Medal examples to compare with these you posted. Mine aren't nearly as nice as yours. Anyway, here's # 1... look at the wear especially at the top of the medal's ring. This guy was worn for years.

              Robert
              Attached Files

              Comment


                #8
                magnified view of the tower, arch on # 1...
                Attached Files

                Comment


                  #9
                  Here's Leningrad # 2. Worn and dirty, but still some detail left down deep...
                  Attached Files

                  Comment


                    #10
                    # 2 magnified...
                    Attached Files

                    Comment


                      #11
                      # 3 Leningrad in much better condition...
                      Attached Files

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Although the figures are worn away to blobs on Robert's #1 notice that DESPITE all that wear, all that medal's "portholes" are distinct, and that unlike any of the ones I have shown (or have but haven't scanned) the sides of the gateway arch come ALL THE WAY DOWN on that medal-- visible BELOW the sailor's billowing cap ribbons and under the main figure's chin!

                        Comment


                          #13
                          # 3 magnified...
                          Attached Files

                          Comment


                            #14
                            I hesitated posting this 4th photo. It has the very nice and complete gold gilting. There is moderate wear, but STILL 100% gilting remaining. And the strangest thing of all is the complete absence of the archway. I may be wrong, correct me if i am, but I think this piece is a cast copy made either from a heavily worn piece and regilted OR a cast copy from a medal that was made from VERY worn dies. You be the judge.

                            #4...
                            Attached Files

                            Comment


                              #15
                              # 4 up close. Notice the lack of the archway, yet the faces survived all the wear better...What's the deal? Worn dies? I don't know.
                              Perhaps there is still just a hint of an archway, but not much!
                              Attached Files

                              Comment

                              Users Viewing this Thread

                              Collapse

                              There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.

                              Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                              Working...
                              X