Warning: session_start(): open(/var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74/sess_6bfcc333cc7e16632d5bc9445f698543866f47ddfea3026a, O_RDWR) failed: No space left on device (28) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 Warning: session_start(): Failed to read session data: files (path: /var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 Soviet Russian Budenovka 1939 dated Original or Copy? - Wehrmacht-Awards.com Militaria Forums
Lakeside Trader - 2nd Banner

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Soviet Russian Budenovka 1939 dated Original or Copy?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
    #1

    Soviet Russian Budenovka 1939 dated Original or Copy?

    Help needed with this Soviet Russian Budenovka 1939 dated is it Original or a Copy? Thank you for any help
    Attached Files
    Tags: None
    #2
    Hello,

    Fake.

    Comment

      #3
      Thank you , Just had to make sure ,

      Comment

        #4
        Originally posted by Jakard View Post
        Hello,

        Fake.

        Such futile things like arguments, explanations, proofs, are still pleasant to see in a forum which is not ruled by bots and the Boole algebra...

        Comment

          #5
          Originally posted by kradman View Post
          Thank you , Just had to make sure ,

          From my point of view it could be a reenactor item.


          Cloth is brand new, no oxydation or decoloration, no wear, no tears, and the stamp is blury.


          Still cool for a few dozen bucks.

          Comment

            #6
            Originally posted by seb16trs View Post
            Such futile things like arguments, explanations, proofs, are still pleasant to see in a forum which is not ruled by bots and the Boole algebra...
            You see this in so many online forums, one word answers that destroy the credibility of an item in a second and casts doubt on it for the rest of it's existance.

            In this case it's correct, however an explanation as to why wouldn't have hurt.

            Comment

              #7
              Originally posted by seb16trs View Post


              Cloth is brand new, no oxydation or decoloration, no wear, no tears, and the stamp is blury.

              .

              I'm always a little hesitant to take "condition is too good" as a sole reason for declaring a thing a fake. We have seen the occasional stone-mint item that is completely good.

              I accept that this may not be genuine, I have no dog in the fight at all. But is there any other reason to say so than condition and a poorly-applied stamp?

              Comment

              Previous template Next

              Users Viewing this Thread

              Collapse

              There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.

              Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

              Working...
              X