JR. on WAF - medamilitaria@gmail.com

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Household Cavalry Helmet

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Household Cavalry Helmet

    Hello and Happy New Year! I was wondering if anyone could help me wiht this piece...the item description and case indicates that the owner served in Bombay which seems incorrect for Household Cavalry. Any thoughts? I reproduced the description below. THANKS!

    Elaborate silver-plated "Albert Pattern" full dress helmet, with a short-pointed front visor, and a long-sloped visor at the rear. The helmet bear fire-gilt brass decorations throughout: At front is an oval badge surrounded by a wreath of laurel and oak leaves, surmounted by a crown and with a white metal sunburst at center. At the center of this is an oval Order of the Garter badge. The crown is capped with a brass plate in the form of a sunburst, with a white metal spike at center, topped with a drooping red-dyed horsehair plume, which can be removed for combat or storage. The leather chin strap is covered by gilt brass rings, and is secured to the helmet by a large threaded gilt brass rosette at each side. The interior is fitted with a brown leather eight-fingered liner, with a brass-buckled leather strap across the dome allowing adjustment to the fit. The helmet is housed in a tin case with a domed lid, painted black with a red mottled design, and is fitted with a carrying handle. A painted inscription on the lid reads: "Lieut. J.C. Hastings. R.A.M.C.", indicating that the owner was a lieutenant in the Royal Army Medical Corps. The case further bears seven paper labels, most badly faded or flaking. One again bears Hastings' name and rank, hand-inscribed in black ink, while two are shipping labels from Geo. W. Wheatley & Co., a shipping company headquartered on Regent Street in London. A third label simply reads "Bombay", most likely the destination to which the helmet was to be shipped, and the location to which Hastings was posted. The helmet shows minor dents, including to the Garter badge at front, and the liner bears some tears and flaking, else very good. The "Albert Pattern" helmet was adopted in 1842 for use by various British Heavy Cavalry units, including the Household Cavalry, the official bodyguards of the reigning regent. The R.A.M.C. was established in 1898, and it is likely that the helmet dates between that time and the beginning of World War I.
    Attached Files

    #2
    Household Cavalry

    Here is the case...I forgot to add that it says RAMC which also seems odd. Any insight woudl be greatly appreciated! THANKS!
    Attached Files

    Comment


      #3
      Helmet looks good, but it is an other ranks example, in this case for the Royal Horse Guards ( The Blues ).
      The helmet has a King's Crown, so, theoretically, pre-1953, although I believe these were worn well into the current sovereign's reign.
      As to the carrying case marked to the RAMC, the Household Cavalry had, of course, surgeons attached from the RAMC, and vets from the RAVC as well, to tend to the horses.
      The Household Cavalry, of course, never served in India, and again, an officer would not have worn this helmet; medical officers of the Household Cavalry wear a cocked fore & aft cap.
      RAMC officers wore the standard home service helmet, in the days of full dress, pre-1914.
      This officer may have served with the HC, and then was posted to India, but I'm guessing the connection is tenuous.
      Do you have a link to the seller?

      Bob Shoaf

      Comment


        #4
        I would hazzard a guess the case does not go with the helmet the case looks older . rob
        God please take justin bieber and gave us dio back

        Comment


          #5
          Thanks, guys!

          I was thinking the helmet might not go with the case, but of course, it is possible that he was sent to India as Robert suggested. Thank you for all of the help again!!

          http://auctions.alexautographs.com/a...refno=+++90492

          Comment


            #6
            Yet another case of an auction house being clueless, lazy, or worse.
            The description implies that an RAMC lieutenant wore an other ranks RHG helmet;
            not bloody likely.

            Bob Shoaf

            Comment


              #7
              Forgot to mention re:auction; price estimate is far too high, although I'm not surprised.

              Bob Shoaf

              Comment


                #8
                Thanks Robert...I would guess clueless but you can't be too sure! Thank you again for your valuable insights!

                Comment

                Users Viewing this Thread

                Collapse

                There are currently 2 users online. 0 members and 2 guests.

                Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                Working...
                X