Don't know if this is the right place to ask, but I will anyway. I've noticed in pictures of funerals, honor guards etc that the typical stance is at attention with the feet much wider apart than one would expect. Is there anything to this? I suppose there's a joke about cajones in there somewhere. Frankly I think it looks ridiculous but that's just me.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why such wide stance?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Biber View PostDon't know if this is the right place to ask, but I will anyway. I've noticed in pictures of funerals, honor guards etc that the typical stance is at attention with the feet much wider apart than one would expect. Is there anything to this? I suppose there's a joke about cajones in there somewhere. Frankly I think it looks ridiculous but that's just me.
For funerals etc British servicemen (even RAF) stand at attention - if your feet are apart you are 'at ease', you cannot be at 'attention' with your feet apart. Not in our Drill Manual anyway.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Biber View PostNope. German. The most recent place I recall noticing it was in a thread about funeral pillows.
Comment
-
From my research, it was a more formal version of a parade rest for a guard detail. You see the Reich Chancellery guards in this position with their rifles at a "slope arms" type of carry. Every time they needed to come to attention, they would snap the rifle up and the feet back together.
Here's a good video showing an LAH man on guard duty, you can see him bring his rifle up in the beginning, present, and go back to the wide stance.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3O3nxFJ8-10
If you've ever stood with your rifle at attention, it quickly becomes tiring and your muscles start to hurt. It is easier to stand in this position for an extended period of time, while still having a formal appearance.Last edited by dixiedrummer; 02-11-2014, 05:17 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by pauke View PostIsn't this image reversed as the ribbons are over the opposite pocket among other details?
Yes it is - the belts are also 'back to front'. What is most interesting though is the use of old WW2 type helmets instead of the BW US style. Considering that they are all of General rank I'd thought there may have been a RKT in there.
Comment
-
Generals
I tried to find more about this Generals, but the only statement I found is that all 6 were awared with with RK during WWII. Based on the timeline, all of them were allready high rank officers pre-45.
Here is another picture, also Konrad Adenauer's funeral. This time navy.
Regards
ChristianAttached Files
Comment
-
Originally posted by compressore View PostI tried to find more about this Generals, but the only statement I found is that all 6 were awared with with RK during WWII. Christian
Why are they not wearing it? They have all their other medals on (albeit only ribbons which I find odd), maybe the RK is on the ribbon bar?
Comment
Users Viewing this Thread
Collapse
There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.
Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.
Comment