Guys,
I am one who will always default to never mess with a historical item. However, if a helmet, for example, has already been messed with after the war, I have no problem stripping the postwar paint and the postwar parts and adding original period parts to bring the helmet back to what it would have looked like. But this means not creating a fictitious "identity" for the helmet - like making it an SS when there is zero evidence it was issues that way.
I don't really like when the refurbished ones are made to fit a profile that likely had nothing to do with their wartime service.
I know that purists will want nothing but a complete helmet that has not been touched at all since the war, but am looking for people's opinions on restored versus refurbished.
I am one who will always default to never mess with a historical item. However, if a helmet, for example, has already been messed with after the war, I have no problem stripping the postwar paint and the postwar parts and adding original period parts to bring the helmet back to what it would have looked like. But this means not creating a fictitious "identity" for the helmet - like making it an SS when there is zero evidence it was issues that way.
I don't really like when the refurbished ones are made to fit a profile that likely had nothing to do with their wartime service.
I know that purists will want nothing but a complete helmet that has not been touched at all since the war, but am looking for people's opinions on restored versus refurbished.
Comment