DAK low boots for review.

[Overlord1944]

Please opinions.

[Overlord1944]

Pics 2.

[Overlord1944]

Pics 3.

[Overlord1944]

Pics 4.

[Overlord1944]

Pics 5.

[John Hodgin]

First quick glance is positive.

[anmarlodz]

IMO not original.

[blau250]

I do not like the canvas. Soles seem to be artificially aged. There are some fakes of the tropical boots and even of the WSS pattern ones. Be aware
P.S. Where these fakes are made? Czech Rep??

[Gran Sasso]

Fakes for sure

[Jos L C]

I agree, fake boots ..


Jos.

[Overlord1944]

Thanks for the opinions!

[mathluft]

Agree, bad pair

[John Hodgin]

Interesting, outside details are very close to originals are they not? Did not see the interior photos earlier, they would not load on the computer at the time, these betray that they are not genuine,

[argan]

Sorry.. I had one of these pair, quite identical, some years ago. Now I can tell you they are fake.
original pair are very very hard to find, and if you have a look at an original pair, you can see the differences: first of all the sole, the material, the markings.. all is different.

Take always on mind that original pairs have anyway about 70 years old: also unissued pairs have an "old" appearance.
be aware of new examples..

All the best

[NZMark]

Indeed a reproduction set - clever, but the fake ageing is a dead giveaway - let alone a few other very telling details.
Mark