SS runic collar tab - opinions needed

[EiSVOGEL']

Hi guys,
would you please share your opinions about this collar tab?
A friend purchased this one recently but for me its not an original tab.
It is trying to look like a late war ribbed example but it's not what I would like to see.
Your feedback is well appreciated, thank you in advance
Cheers

[Kurt Meyer]

It's a nein.

[sam1chlt]

I wouldn't want it for my collection.

[Il_brillante]

[EvaB1945]

you got yourself a dud.. sorry it's nein from me.

[madandi]

Its very interessting.
Please tell me why not.
I know the originals of this pattern where the runes are closer to each other.
Is this a 100% giveaway?

[Guest]

If this tab which started the thread is trying to replicate something similar to a " ribbed rune / late war tab " my observations against it would be that the actual weaving of the runes themselves are incorrect; on my wartime example the weave is in a much tighter form ( making the black dots more prominent between the weaves ) also personally I am not a fan of the amount of material and finish on the reverse of the tab featured in this thread . Jim

[Stossgruppe3]

Yes very interesting
It shows one or two red flags for me too
As already mentioned the weave and the buckram
are my concerns. Having said that I would'nt mind it in my
fake collection regards
David

[cbuehler]

Yes very interesting
It shows one or two red flags for me too
As already mentioned the weave and the buckram
are my concerns. Having said that I would'nt mind it in my
fake collection regards
David

I second this. The runes are an interesting take, but I believe it is not good either.

CB

[Kurt Meyer]

I agree with David.

[Ludwig]

IMO not original.

[espenlaub]

Fake. When reassembling it, inside is a synthetic underlayer used to reinforce embroidery

[herrgeezer]

I agree with some other members that it's an interesting presentation of the runes.

[ferdiThePanzer]

bad bad bad worse