CollectorToCollector

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How Plane Tree works

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    How Plane Tree works

    Here's how the plane tree patterns work. I hope this can clarify some of the misconceptions, and make it easier to identify the good and the bad.

    There are two main types of plane tree- numbered and unnumbered. This post deals with the numbered patterns.

    Three main patterns exist- 1/2, 3/4, and 5/6. Each is similar to the others yet unique. Why are there three different plane tree patterns? I suspect in an effort to increase the randomness of the pattern and further avoid discernible repeats, as ludicrous as it sounds. How they thought someone running through the battlefield was going to notice a suspicious pattern of spots & blobs on a zeltbahn is beyond me.

    Further muddling the waters, is the fact that each of these three has two variations- "hand screened" and "overprint". Thus, there are six different numbered patterns- but in reality, there are actually 12 possible screen sets. To add to the migraine building in your head, each plane tree is comprised of two sets of screens- right and left. (Plus there are a couple of SS-VT subtypes which we'll leave out- but they follow suit.) In typical German fashion, there is a logical system in use, however asinine it may be in practice.

    In order to avoid a visible repetition, the SS devised a pattern that is specific to Zeltbahns- approximately 55 x 72 inches. (Not so curiously, the unnumbered plane trees repeat at 32"- the height of a smock. So clever...)
    There are 3 screens (a fourth color is the result of 2 screens overlapping). The "plane tree" patterns incorporate the actual cutting lines for the Zeltbahn within the pattern itself. The base of and diagonal edges of the Zeltbahn are indicated by staggered blocks of the black. There are also crosses at several points- these are to help align the fabric with the silk screens when it's on the printing table. (72" is too big for rollers, so these are hand printed.) The numbers are at opposite corners- each repeat has a 1-2, 3-4 or 5-6.
    A Zeltbahn that was assembled "correctly" is cut along these guide lines. If assembled as designed, the right and left panels should have matching numbers- 1-1, 2-2 and so forth. In practice this often didn't happen.



    The photo: I used 3 original zelts. Two overprint and one hand screen. One of the overprints (C) was cut too low (on the pattern) which exposes the cut blocks and the beginning of the next repeat (see the 1 in the upper right corner.) B was cut too high which allows it to be matched up with C to get the whole pattern for that panel. I didn't have another 1-2 overprint with a right side #1 panel, but the black design remains the same on both hand screened and overprint. I added large numbers so they are easier to see, and the white lines are where the material was designed to have been cut. I identified the zelts A, B, and C.

    Left and Right: What few people realize (I didn't until we went to cut fabric to make zelts) is that one of these "repeats" can only make two rights or two lefts. You cannot cut a left and a right from one repeat. "Properly" constructed plane tree zelts must be made from two different rolls of fabric. The pattern of 1-2 right green side, makes the left panel of the brown side. Therefore, right brown is left green.
    Essentially, the printer probably had two printing tables- one running "right" screens and one running "left". Or, they printed the green right side, changed inks, printed brown left side on another roll, then inverted the process. So, each plane tree (say 1-2) is made up of two sets of screens. Does your head hurt yet?


    Overprint: Originally, all three colors were hand screened- a very slow and laborious process which was criminally insane during an all-out War. This was reduced by 2/3's by hand screening only the black. Then the brown and green (or light brown & brown) oak leaf screens were used to overprint the black via roller. Later patterns (oak, blurred edge) dispensed with the hand screening nonsense entirely. However, even late War items are still made with all types of plane tree indicating that it's production was never fully replaced.


    What's this all mean? Those most obvious things I can think of regards the numbers. Lack of them on a piece frequently causes all sorts of hand wringing and fretting. However, once the Germans started cutting the plane tree fabric irregardless of how the designers intended, it's entirely possible to end up with zeltbahns with no numbers- and with what appear to be oddly angled diagonal "cut blocks". When cutting caps and covers, most won't have a number since there are only 2 numbers for every 5 feet of fabric. If your plane tree item has a repeat, it's doo doo. (If it's overprint this applies only to the black- the oak overlay will repeat). No smock or zelt is large enough to show a repeat. Also, the only place a smock can have a number on it's main body is on a bicep. (The small pieces notwithstanding) Below I laid out two smocks to show how they are oriented on the fabric when cut. (One cut smock is the size of two finished ones since it's folded in half when sewn.) The cut area is about 66 x 55. So, if you end up with any numbers, they'll be on the upper arm.
    If you have the right combination of zelts, you can easily can repeat this demo for yourself.
    Enjoy.


    #2
    A nice post for the novice collector, for those who are into camo it is yesterday's news.

    Mark Steacy will elaborate in detail on the plane tree variant that has no numbers (that is the one developed from the 5/6).


    Originally posted by n160 View Post
    How they thought someone running through the battlefield was going to notice a suspicious pattern of spots & blobs on a zeltbahn is beyond me.

    That has to do with the fact that the plane tree pattern was designed for zelts. Once you build a 12 men tent from those shelters a large diversity of patterns is a vital feature for a good camo effect.



    Cheers

    Comment


      #3
      Thanks for taking the time to put this post together. Nice examples to illustrate your points as well!

      regards, Robert

      Comment


        #4
        Novices are not the only ones confused by planetree...

        Comment


          #5
          Borsarello must be scratching his head.........

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by salt*creek View Post
            Borsarello must be scratching his head.........
            Not really, it had been explained in the beaver book already - which, I think, he had some share in.

            It will be explained (in detail) in Mark Steacy's upcoming book - among a number of other things.



            Cheers

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by n160 View Post
              Novices are not the only ones confused by planetree...

              Don't let plane tree confuse you!

              Comment


                #8
                plane tree

                does anyone have a picture of the PLane Tree no. 1 , the original designed pattern ? before it was modified ? A picture of this pattern has been very illusive for me to reference .
                jim

                Comment


                  #9
                  How Plane Tree works

                  Someone worked out the meaning of life
                  I can breath better now

                  Comment


                    #10
                    I don't know why you two feel obligated to denigrate N160's posting. If you aren't learning anything from his comments, that's fine, but this forum exists for more than just those who consider themselves experts.

                    Negative comments about articles posted for everyone's benefit just discourage people from sharing. No one wants to be belittled - if what is posted is apparent to you, that's great.

                    s/f Robert

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by RobertE View Post
                      I don't know why you two feel obligated to denigrate N160's posting. If you aren't learning anything from his comments, that's fine, but this forum exists for more than just those who consider themselves experts.

                      Negative comments about articles posted for everyone's benefit just discourage people from sharing. No one wants to be belittled - if what is posted is apparent to you, that's great.

                      s/f Robert
                      Robert,
                      what you have posted now is merely your (false) interpretation of my post.

                      Allow me to quote myself:

                      Originally posted by Fritz View Post
                      A nice post for the novice collector,

                      Cheers

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by Jim Toncar View Post
                        does anyone have a picture of the PLane Tree no. 1 , the original designed pattern ? before it was modified ? A picture of this pattern has been very illusive for me to reference .
                        jim
                        As far as I know it will be shown in the afore mentioned book. I hope the work on that book will be finished "soon".

                        Cheers

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by salt*creek View Post
                          Borsarello must be scratching his head.........
                          He had it mostly right as I recall- it's the bit about it requiring two different rolls of fabric to make the right & left panels that threw most people off. When we first tried to print it in 1998, it drove us nuts for a week before we figured out what those lunatics (Germans) had done.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by Fritz View Post
                            Robert,
                            Originally posted by Fritz View Post
                            what you have posted now is merely your (false) interpretation of my post.

                            Allow me to quote myself:

                            <TABLE border=0 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=6 width="100%"><TBODY><TR><TD style="BORDER-BOTTOM: 1px inset; BORDER-LEFT: 1px inset; BORDER-TOP: 1px inset; BORDER-RIGHT: 1px inset" class=alt2>Originally Posted by Fritz
                            A nice post for the novice collector,
                            </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
                            Cheers


                            Sure Fritz, let me help you with the whole quote:

                            "A nice post for the novice collector, for those who are into camo it is yesterday's news."

                            If I misinterpreted your tone, sorry about that.

                            regards, Robert

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by n160 View Post
                              He had it mostly right as I recall- it's the bit about it requiring two different rolls of fabric to make the right & left panels that threw most people off. When we first tried to print it in 1998, it drove us nuts for a week before we figured out what those lunatics (Germans) had done.
                              I think Beaver had that explained in his book incl. this detail. I agree that it is hard to follow or even to work out by yourself when all you start with is just a smock or zelt.



                              Wasn't the SM wholesale plane tree printed in that (correct) way? But I think back then they only had overprint.

                              Not sure if you were involved in the "SMwholesale" production.

                              Cheers

                              Comment

                              Users Viewing this Thread

                              Collapse

                              There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.

                              Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                              Working...
                              X