BrunoMado

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

SS Deschler Scull

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    more photos
    Attached Files

    Comment


      #17
      final
      Attached Files

      Comment


        #18
        There are many points that I do not like about that skull. I have seen this skull made of other materials too, (and with other markings). Here are some of the bad points, IMO.

        Chris
        Attached Files

        Comment


          #19
          As you can see here, someone has been trying to get this right.
          Attached Files

          Comment


            #20
            reverse
            Attached Files

            Comment


              #21
              Same flaws
              Attached Files

              Comment


                #22
                Skull

                John T,
                Your skull is 100%. Nice
                Chris,
                I do not own one, but almost purchased one 2 yaers ago at the Kassel show from Peter Jenkins. The only problem was, the pins were missing and the pin mounts were really messed with. In other words, it was beyond anything I could restore, so I passed. The skull Peter J. has was aluminum, just like John T's. There was absolutely no doubt in my my mind the skull Peter had was real, as is John T's.
                Peter

                Comment


                  #23
                  I remember the SSBW site had an alluminum Deschler with no pins and alot brown glue type residue in the pin recesses. I recall it having RZM over 52 behind the teeth. I could be mistaken but I just dont recall the M1 prefix on the one I saw and it could be a different skull altogether than the one Peter recalls.

                  I like the John T. Deschler also

                  KM
                  Last edited by Kale Michael; 02-11-2013, 12:29 AM. Reason: clarify

                  Comment


                    #24
                    Well, I must respectfully agree to disagree here, but here are the photos of the skull that was for sale by Peter J. sometime ago. As was stated, it is void of the "M1/" prefix.

                    Chris
                    Attached Files

                    Comment


                      #25
                      Here is the reverse, (note the lack of ridges around the eyes and nose holes).
                      Also, as was stated, the prong attachments were messed with, to the point of no return.

                      Chris
                      Attached Files
                      Last edited by SScollector; 02-11-2013, 08:48 PM.

                      Comment


                        #26
                        Skull

                        Yes that is Peter Jenkins skull. The one I pondered over. Interesting that the mark is devoid of the M1. That makes 2 variations. Both skulls are real IMO, 100%. I have no doubt or reservation / hesitation about it. As far as the subject skull of this thread, I do not care for it.
                        Peter

                        Comment


                          #27
                          well...

                          Originally posted by WalterB View Post
                          Weitze. The fact that anyone still does business with him is amazing.
                          Because, sometimes, he finds great stuff.....

                          Comment


                            #28
                            Originally posted by Dr. Strangelove View Post
                            Because, sometimes, he finds great stuff.....
                            yes sometims,but i have sent him a lot of stuff back,to be honest its the only one dealer that i still buy after all the returns i know him in person and he never has problems to take items back,and i never seen this items relisted

                            Comment


                              #29
                              Originally posted by SScollector View Post
                              Here is the reverse, (note the lack of ridges around the eyes and nose holes).
                              Also, as was stated, the prong attachments were messed with, to the point of no return.

                              Chris
                              Hi Chris

                              Just to be clear, in your opinion was the aluminium skull for sale by peter jenkins an original.

                              Also would the lack of the "m1" markings indicate this to have been a very early produced skull (maybe around the d&sm and 52 skulls era?).

                              Regards
                              Chris (cris403)
                              Last edited by cris403; 02-12-2013, 11:51 AM. Reason: .

                              Comment


                                #30
                                Heres mine that i posted a while back, had the from fellow members.
                                Attached Files

                                Comment

                                Users Viewing this Thread

                                Collapse

                                There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.

                                Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                                Working...
                                X