I now wonder what would you say about mine?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Helmet covers ..........good and bad
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by salt*creek View PostThe fact is that the SS helmet cover is
One of the rarest pieces of SS camo to find. They
Made millions of them, but they just don't show
Up very often.
Apart from fakes, that are without a doubt around, there were numerous great camo items available over the last years. As far as covers are concerned they are not an exception.
I see two reasons for that:
1st The general economic situation which forces a number of collectors to sell.
2nd The "exposure of the italian covers" that made quite some people nervous and make them sell their originals that they think might be italian.
There were plenty of covers posted here in recent times that are right as rain.
Originally posted by salt*creek View PostFinally, that extra
piece sewn across the front is really strange.
Every real helmet cover I've seen that has that
Reinforcement, has it made from another kind
Of fabric.
Covers from ca. 1940 are an exception, these seem to only have used other sorts of (plain) fabric for that reinforcement.
Consult the beaver books in order to see a number of covers that used camo material for that reinforcement.
Other materials than camo were used throughout the war but from somewhen in 1941/42 the camo cloth became dominant for that part of a cover.
Originally posted by salt*creek View PostIt's my opinion that that strip of material is a REPAIR
And not the original design if the cover.
They, nonetheless, seem to be manufacturer variants as covers without reinforcement were made up to the war's end.
I would say though that, in the total number of covers made, the variants with reinforecement are slightly dominant and they are absolutely dominant among those that were manufactured from around 42 on (incl. type 1s).
To get a feeling for what was issued and when, I recommend books dedicated to the Waffen-SS and not those dedicated to camo. One has to look quite hard though as especially the type that uses camo material for the reinforcement is very hard to make out, in some cases you can only tell them by the seam. Plain fabric is of course easier to spot.
This being said, all sorts of reinforcement are being reproduced today, plain and camo.
Cheers
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fritz View PostCovers, IMO, are not of the "rarest" pieces of ss camo. Unless they were made in a rare camo pattern or variant. Kombis are rare, lateral smocks are rare, oak four pocket - and panzer uniforms are rare, dot jump smocks are rare. An ordinary cover is not rare IMO. Just look how many have been posted here surrounding this topic.
Cheers
I would add Erbsenmuster winter parka and pants and blurred edge winter pants (never saw here)
Comment
-
Originally posted by salt*creek View PostClips? Well, Mike Beaver gave me some that We're painted black. Lately I've seen some in zinc. We all like the plumb colored ones that nobody
Has been able to reproduce, but these new ones Look good. If you look close, they have been sanded Down with really fine sandpaper to "age" them.Last edited by RoyA; 09-19-2012, 01:27 PM.
Comment
-
Francesco.
Re post 20 .
Do you even know what a real cover even looks like ?
You show mine are if I am reading it right you are believing them not war time made?
Please help me understand .
You dont like plum clips.
The last 2 pictures are simple enough.....showing the art of the faker.
1 bad
1 good.
Comment
-
Originally posted by RoyA View PostI will try to help with some photos...here is a well-made fake clip on a fake cover followed by an original on my 1st pattern Plane Tree.
RoyA
That pretty much sums it up, nice job.
This is just my opinion, there is enough information out there now about these covers/clips and someone would be foolish to spend 10K with out doing some research.
Anyone thinking about buying an SS cover better save this thread.
Again, nice job.
Matt
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dr. Strangelove View PostOkay, here is another one of these fakes and Francescos. I showed the one on the bottom to Ted Caso back in the Day and he knew it was bad, so I really had to study them and then after some time I could spot them.
English is limited at explaining good fakes and why we know they are bad, so I figure this picture might help. You could also go to the MAX and walk around with me and I can point them out laying on Tables.
Study my Pic and Francesco's and you will see the fingerprints of this Faker.
W. C. Stump (RIP) (also an expert even in high-end awards w/diamonds) told me once with 100% confidence that my very common award is fake. Everybody make mistakes, especially in this hobby with such a high level of scepticizm
Comment
-
Originally posted by A c h t u n g ! View PostWho is Ted Caso? Why do you think that Ted Caso was right? Why do you think that this cover is fake?
W. C. Stump (RIP) (also an expert even in high-end awards w/diamonds) told me once with 100% confidence that my very common award is fake. Everybody make mistakes, especially in this hobby with such a high level of scepticizm
So: Why do you think that this cover is right? Why do you think you aren't the one making a mistake here?
Again with respect, I get the impression from your posts that you want to learn and that you have to learn in this field - if you want to be able to understand it better - Just like I try to do since many years.
So instead of engaging in pointless arguments and accusing others of making mistakes you should perhaps try to invest your time and effort to think about why these may not be right.
Cheers
Comment
Users Viewing this Thread
Collapse
There is currently 0 user online. 0 members and 0 guests.
Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.
Comment