BD Publishing

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

SS skullllllllllll ! Good one ?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    SS skullllllllllll ! Good one ?

    Opinions needed ! I own only the posted photos....Thanks !
    Last edited by GrenadierKarl; 08-09-2006, 03:00 AM.

    #2
    .
    Last edited by GrenadierKarl; 08-09-2006, 03:00 AM.

    Comment


      #3
      Looks bogus to me.

      Comment


        #4
        Crap.

        Comment


          #5
          I had a bad feeling too.....

          Comment


            #6
            Another skull with doubts......!? The seller says 100% original item and no fake....is it right?
            Last edited by GrenadierKarl; 08-09-2006, 03:00 AM.

            Comment


              #7
              .
              Last edited by GrenadierKarl; 08-09-2006, 03:00 AM.

              Comment


                #8
                ..
                Last edited by GrenadierKarl; 08-09-2006, 03:00 AM.

                Comment


                  #9
                  I am not certain about this one, but I think it is OK. I would like to see some better photos, but, from these, it looks like an original RZM 52 Deschler. If it is original, I suspect that the pins have been replaced. I have only seen this type of TK with flat pins with squared ends (no points). However, it could also be an original variation I am simply not familiar with. I would really like to inspect this one first hand.

                  I will be interested to see what Chris has to say.

                  Brad

                  Comment


                    #10
                    It doesn't look good to me, but I need better pics to be sure!
                    Remember that the "RZM 52" and "D.&S.M." marked skulls were by far, the thinnest of all SS visor insignias, including all makers skulls, eagles, ect.

                    Best, Chris
                    Last edited by SScollector; 08-03-2006, 06:35 PM.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      The seller said RZM 52 marked ......Sorry, I got no other photos...

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Ask the seller for better photos. If he sends them to you, post them here.
                        If not, then I would highly suggest to stay away from it.

                        Best, Chris

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by SScollector
                          Ask the seller for better photos. If he sends them to you, post them here.
                          If not, then I would highly suggest to stay away from it.

                          Best, Chris
                          Chris,

                          You made a very valid observation regarding the thickness. The RZM52s are normally quite thin, to the point of seeming delicate. In spite of this very legitimate concern, I am not yet ready to dismiss this one entirely. Other than the thickness and the unusual pins for this style, are you seeing anything else which I don't? I would like to fully understand your rationale.

                          Thanks,
                          Brad

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Hi Brad!

                            Yes, but I really can't clarify anything for sure, without better pictures.
                            Like I said, I would not dismiss it 100% either, without better photos but I
                            certainly believe that it is most likely a fake. Anyway, I have seen many good "RZM 52" castings and this one appears very similar to one particular strand of fakes that I have seen, (except for the pins). The material appears to be the exact same color and tone, (I don't know what it is and I really can't explain how it looks to me, but it is just different from the originals). The aging appears too dark on some of the high points of the surface and it doesn't look natural to me. Also, the crispness of the surface appears lacking as well. This might all be due to the photos but because of the thickness, I seriously doubt it.
                            Awaiting better photos. If it is real, the seller will most likely be willing to provide better photos. If not, then it certainly most likely bad.

                            Best, Chris

                            Comment


                              #15
                              They're both bad. RZM in a circle with a 52? Give me a break!

                              Comment

                              Users Viewing this Thread

                              Collapse

                              There are currently 3 users online. 0 members and 3 guests.

                              Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                              Working...
                              X