Kampfgruppe

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Zeiss 7x50 Binoctar Kriegsmarine with questions

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Zeiss 7x50 Binoctar Kriegsmarine with questions

    I got these Zeiss KM Binos, model Binoctar, 7x50. Lens cover is here, but no container. The Binos look good so far to me, but bear some things I have not seen before:
    the Kriegsmarine Eagle M is in quite some angle...I only know a bigger version, sitting upright. Is this correct on earlier versions? Definately doesn´t look like a fake, but haven´t seen this before. There is still some glue on the swastika from a sticker covering it, haven´t cleaned anything yet.
    On the right side there is an engraving in same angle....278 Art, which would indicate a glass from the artillery to me. Why is this on a KM piece, and what exactly does it mean? Art is Artillery, 278 is what?
    Is it possible to locate the year of this glass? SN is 1944032.
    It is unopened, no damage to screws. But still, there is no "Strichplatte" inside. is this correct?

    As you see, many questions to a glass. I think it could be quite nice, but many unknown factors at present. And please excuse the bad pictures, it is late and dark, and camera not of finest quality ;-)

    Thanks for any help!














    #2
    interesting binoculars.
    i think the binoculars was build in 1939.
    the bino was originaly not build for the kriegsmarine but perhaps they were adopt by the kriegsmarine.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by wilddieb View Post
      interesting binoculars.
      i think the binoculars was build in 1939.
      the bino was originaly not build for the kriegsmarine but perhaps they were adopt by the kriegsmarine.
      Hi,
      why not built for KM? As far as I know Binoctars are quite common for KM glasses?
      Thanks!

      Comment


        #4
        Nobody else an idea?

        Comment


          #5
          first it was a binoctar for civil usage (no rage bar, no lens coating.....) but the later added KM engraving looks good. i think it is original.

          best

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by porro View Post
            first it was a binoctar for civil usage (no rage bar, no lens coating.....) but the later added KM engraving looks good. i think it is original.

            best
            Thanks! And what do you think about the 264 Art engraving...to what purpose could this be?

            Comment


              #7
              Nice binocular that you have, this one has a not so common markings.
              ART stands for Artillery


              Andy

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by AndyC View Post
                Nice binocular that you have, this one has a not so common markings.
                ART stands for Artillery


                Andy
                This is what I thought as well, so mabe these are binos from the Marineartillery?
                Which would explain some things about the missing coating and the "non- marine" quality. Anybody seen these markings of the eagly in this angle before?

                Comment

                Users Viewing this Thread

                Collapse

                There are currently 2 users online. 0 members and 2 guests.

                Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                Working...
                X