Nice set up, except it is a Jager tunic with an edelweiss not DAK. Probably worn in Italy.... unless the edelweiss is added postwar which is certainly possible
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Ist Model Dak NCO tunic
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Tim OK View PostNice set up, except it is a Jager tunic with an edelweiss not DAK. Probably worn in Italy.... unless the edelweiss is added postwar which is certainly possible
Comment
-
I believe there was a Company sized GJ element to the SV288 so it would seem logical that they wore the edelweiss and the other GJ unit as well. I owned a very faded 2nd model trop tunic that clearly showed the faded patch on the right sleeve, so its entirely plausable this patch is fine. I would be concerned if it was a tropical version of the edelweiss sewn on the sleeve but this one looks good to me. One would need a hands on to be sure, but one would truely have to cut some thread to see if there is any fade marks and see how it sits into the tunic. Additionally, as Mark has pointed out and we can all see there is minimal wear to the tunic. Mark and Sunny have it/had it in hand and can give us their opinions on it, but it looks well done. Either way its a very eye pleasing tunic. Matt
Comment
-
Originally posted by OSS View PostIf I am not mistaken, G.J. Rgt. 756 served in Tunisia. It has also been suggested that a battalion of S.V. 288 wore the Edelweiss patch.
I was referring to the actual tunic being worn during the War, not what it represents today. Of course it can be made to appear like anything now, what ever the owner wishes....
I really like that the material used to make the tunic appears to match the material used on the straps. A very nice tunic that anyone would be proud to ownLast edited by Tim O'Keefe; 07-22-2013, 01:00 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tim OK View PostQuite correct GJ 756 did serve in Tunisia (not with the DAK). And a single Co. from SV 288 DAK did wear the edelweiss. Less than 100 men & a few more nco's. So for this to be a DAK NCO's tunic with edelweiss, would be rare in the extreme. Is the edelweiss original to the tunic ?
I was referring to the actual tunic being worn during the War, not what it represents today. Of course it can be made to appear like anything now, what ever the owner wishes....
I really like that the material used to make the tunic appears to match the material used on the straps. A very nice tunic that anyone would be proud to own
Comment
-
Originally posted by OSS View PostI generally accept any German forces who fought and died in Afrika as "DAK" though this is not technically correct. Perhaps there was a succession of new troops who arrived in Africa during the nearly three year campaign who were rtegarded by their predecessors as "newcomers" from the 5th Light to the HG Division. At any rate, I have seen tunics with Edelweiss being worn in Africa and the presence of one does not necessarily exclude it from that theatre (N. Africa). I would imagine adding one to a first pattern tunic would only diminish it's value to "purists".
Initially even the 90th Lt was not considered to be a DAK unit by the original DAK, though they were excepted later.
Do agree that an edelweiss post war added does diminish a 1st pattern tunics value. And generally would expect to see more of them on 2nd & 3rd patterns.
Before Tunisia, to see an edelweiss on any NCO DAK tunic is extremely rare as only a few nco's in the 2nd Co, SV288 wore them.
Comment
Users Viewing this Thread
Collapse
There are currently 4 users online. 0 members and 4 guests.
Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.
Comment