The Italian material has an unfinished texture in the interior surface-
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Heer gabardine wrap discussion
Collapse
X
-
Gabardine material
Originally posted by Johnny R View PostThe Italian material has an unfinished texture in the interior surface-
The material of my strap is similar. Here is a closeup.Attached Files
Comment
-
Originally posted by B. N. Singer View PostNo sir, my intent was NOT to single you out (as was not the case with Mr. Gibson); I copied your statement as it concerned the misnomer of tailors and their application of insignia as it relates to this example. My apologies to you if it looked that way.
Please note post numbers 32, 33 and 41.
B. N. Singer
My sincere apologies for taking your post the wrong way. No apology necessary because of my misunderstanding.
Johnny,
I have seen the markings several times. I have seen plenty of stuff that did not appear factory made, that had markings. I have seen and had tailored items that had your typical size markings, and none. The markings in this also seem completely amateur to me, which backed up my production thoughts. I could make better markings with a dime store stamp set, and some that made sense. There are extra numbers, dual chest sizes, illegible something that you say is an RBNR number on the pocket, etc. Anybody with stamps and ink can do it, and I have never seen a factory stamp job like this. All that said, it was only an opinion and I could be 100% wrong.
I am 100% behind this wrap and that was all I felt important to get across. My opinion about factory versus non-factory has no bearing on originality. I have seen better made fake gabardine wraps with gorgeous markings...but they remain fake, and this one remains real...but once again, my opinion, to be taken or rejected.
respectfully and apologetically,
RichardAttached Files
Comment
-
They look like good depot stamps to me (RB# below the size/depot markings)..Here is another example with a crossed out chest size marking (a mistake by the person marking it) and then re-stamped accordingly. This factory produced jacket was not retailored.
I happen to like these "human error" details. The two 3 digit numbers at the top are of course the wearers approx height.
GlennAttached Files"A Man's Got to Know His Limitations"
Comment
-
I agree with Glenn, I have seen Military sizes used in prefabricated private purchase tunics etc. but never depot stamps or Rbns. I can see the upper arm of the "R" and the lower part of the "N", the first "0" the back slash etc, the stamp was double struck and bled. IMO that is without question a Factory code.Attached Files
Comment
-
It looks like you guys are correct on this being a factory produced item. I knew the upper measurements were almost 6 feet, but it didn't even dawn on me that they were the approximate height...duh.
Thanks for the illustrated lessons Glenn and Johnny, I also don't believe this jacket was altered in any way from the day it was made. Thanks for your patience.
Richard
Comment
-
Originally posted by Johnny R View PostI agree with Glenn...I can see the upper arm of the "R" and the lower part of the "N", the first "0" the back slash etc, the stamp was double struck and bled. IMO that is without question a Factory code.
B. N. SingerLast edited by B. N. Singer; 03-14-2010, 04:04 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by B. N. Singer View PostReferring to the example of this thread, it is likely that the manufacturer’s code would be more legible if one were to look at the inside of the pocked, were I believe the stamp was placed, as the picture posted actually shows the “bleed through” (of the, if I remember correctly, “RF Nr.”).
B. N. Singer
Comment
-
Users Viewing this Thread
Collapse
There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.
Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.
Comment