This question is fairly obscure, but I am curious...
On several EM's M36 tunics bearing standard M38 collar patches, I've noticed two distinct methods of application. On method is where the patch is attached complete with backing cloth, and is applied by the backing cloth being stitched to the collar. The other method is where the patches are applied without the backing, and the field-grey bars are stitched directly to the collar itself.
I know that both methods are correct for application of this insignia, but wondered if there was any methodology to it -was it just down to the individual appying the insignia, or is one type of application more typical of one period than another? (For example, are patches with the backing more typical of the pre-early war period?)
As I say, very obscure question, but I'm sure some of you guys can put me straight on this one.
Many thanks in advance, Paul.
On several EM's M36 tunics bearing standard M38 collar patches, I've noticed two distinct methods of application. On method is where the patch is attached complete with backing cloth, and is applied by the backing cloth being stitched to the collar. The other method is where the patches are applied without the backing, and the field-grey bars are stitched directly to the collar itself.
I know that both methods are correct for application of this insignia, but wondered if there was any methodology to it -was it just down to the individual appying the insignia, or is one type of application more typical of one period than another? (For example, are patches with the backing more typical of the pre-early war period?)
As I say, very obscure question, but I'm sure some of you guys can put me straight on this one.
Many thanks in advance, Paul.
Comment