Billy Kramer

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Latest Find! P38, AC45, "c-block"!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Thanks guys.
    P08-The finish is about 98%, but finish on these late war pieces is very thin indeed.
    I also forgot to point out that there are other parts on this P38 that are phosphate finish, such as: the trigger, slide release, and safety lever.

    Leon, I dis-agree with your story on these though. I've heard several stories about these, and usually the story is that these are mis-matched because US GIs put them together as souveneers! I use to believe that too, until I started researching it, and looking at some of the facts.
    I've never heard your story before, but it too sounds very far fetched! Let's just look at the fact here:

    1. A single US GI (or factory worker), would most likely not be able to completely assemble an entire P38 if the parts were laid in front of them.

    2. Many matching pistols observed in the AC45 production are also missing proof marks and firing proofs!

    Now let's look at the serial ranges. The MM P38s started appearing in the 33xxc block range. The highest serial number observed is "7468e". Buxtons book states that between 10,000-20,000 MM AC45 P38s were made.
    3. Judging by the serial ranges, the MM P38s started being produced at least 60 days before the Americans ever captured the Walther factory! (Buxton confirms this as well)

    4. There is no way that a handfull of American GIs (or factory workers), would be able to produce that many P38s in just a few days!

    5. There are several photos taken of GIs inside the Walther factory at the time of capture, and there are clearly several cases of P38s that are completed, and the GIs are taking those! Why would they waste time building thier own, or buying them from factory workers?

    6. I've never heard any Walther factory worker confirm that story, nor would I believe that any of them would take such a risk in making a P38 to try and trade it!?

    Anyways, I agree with Buxton, who states that these MM pistols were assembled between mid February 'til begining of April 1945. Why the MM numbers then? Buxton explains that this was simply because each main assembly line (barrels, slides, and frames), were ordered to produce as many of these items as they could. Therefore each of the main parts were being produced at seperate rates. The result was each ended at a different serial range. The highest know serial number for each component is:
    Slide-4232d
    Frame-7468e
    Barrel-1351d

    So you see, that it took much longer to produce a barrel than a slide, and frame production far exceed both barrel, and slide production. (this could also be due to the fact that many FN frames can be found in the AC45 production as well.

    Jim stated that these are usually found here in the US. I believe that is because many of these were completed and boxed awaiting shipment at the factory when the Americans captured it. Many GI looted these boxes of course, and that is how most of these MM AC45s found there way here. Just my two cents on that, but it makes much more sense, and photos confirm the P38s, and looting!

    Matt

    Comment


      #17
      Ac45

      Hi Matt,

      Great job, my friend! This is a kind of "last ditch gun". Very representative of late war chaos that struck over the weapons´ production in Germany during the last weeks of WWII. Man, I love it!

      I must to admit that I hadn´t seen the "white" hammer before. Pretty interesting and it isn´t also a "cog " hammer. By the way: what is the serial range for that kind of hammer?

      Well, now I´d like to see you find a nice 45 dated holters to go with it!

      Congratulations once more!

      Douglas.

      Comment


        #18
        Douglas,

        Glad you like it! The hammer is actually the standard type. The replacement type hammers (or often referred to as the "cog" hammers), are found scattered thoughout the late "AC44", "AC45", late "cyq" and "cvq" marked pistols.
        I agree that this would fit the term "last ditch" weapon. I have also seen an AC45 with the rear sight "in the white" as well!

        Matt

        PS- As for the holster, did you have any doubts?
        Attached Files

        Comment


          #19
          I already have one! Picked this one up several months ago. AS you can see it is a minty "gxy1945" dated P38 holster. If you look closely at the pic above, you will see that the flap is actually made of a different leather. It has a "greenish" color to it, and is very soft.

          Will this one do ok Douglas??
          Attached Files

          Comment


            #20
            Holster

            Matt,

            It seems that you done your homework! Or this is what I´d call premeditated crime! Well, next time I´ll check carefully the older posts! Nice holster with interesting color on that flap.

            Nice, very nice rig! Well done amigo!

            All the best,

            Douglas.

            Comment


              #21
              Thanks Douglas! It's not pre-meditated though. It's called, "I'm a holster nut, and when I find a good holster, I get it, even if I don't even have a gun for it?"

              Right now, I have probably double the amount of holsters as I do pistols! (that all pistol types. For P38s, I would say I have about 2.5 times as many holsters as pistols!)

              Needless to say, I just picked up three more holsters today, while visiting CJ.
              One is an 1941 P38 hardshell, one is a 1943 Sauer 38H pebble grain, and one is an undated Police marked Walther PP holster (very rare!).

              Matt

              Comment


                #22
                Hi Matt,

                Sorry it's taken so long for me to reply about the "c" block mismatches but I've been out of town and also attended a gun show since your post.

                I guess we can agree to disagree.

                Here is my reply, point by point from your post. A little food for thought.

                1. I would guess that the small parts of the basic components of the mismatched P.38s were likely already assembled. Beyond that, there are 4 serial numbered parts. Frame, slide, barrel and locking block. I would guess that many of the factory workers would have enough knowledge to assemble those basic parts into a completed pistol. If not, when it was a choice as to eating or not eating I think they would have learned awfully quick. I would. Possibly some GI's had learned enough from being exposed to P.38s for a length of time to be able to assemble them also, but I have never thought that was the general case with the mismatched guns.

                2. No question that many of the ac45s are found without a firing proof and a final acceptance waffenamt. Those guns would have still been in the process but not completed as far as stampings. I have a real problem, understanding how methodical the Germans were, accepting that they would have issued a gun without being test fired and proof stamped. That had been a strict tradition for many, many years.

                3. The serial range that you quote is a stretch. Buxton lists the "highest COMPONENT serial number" reported, not completed gun. He also states "at best" 10,000 to 20,000 mismatched guns were completed. I don't think it reached near that number. Keep in mind also that Buxton published that Volume I in 1978. A lot of guns have been reported since then.

                4. Many of the ac45 "c" block guns are fully matched. The mismatched guns start showing up in the 3xxxc range. The highest serial numbered component on a completed gun is in the 4xxxd range, according to Buxton. To come up with that number of guns completed (10,000+) you would have to assume that every serial number up to that point was completed into a gun and I don't believe that happened. So if you take 3xxxc to 4xxxd, throw out the serial numbers that were not completed and throw out the serial numbers of guns that were fully matched, you are down to a few thousand guns. If you had a few hundred workers in the plant and most of the workers assembled a few guns, it would seem reasonable that a few thousand could have been assembled by them.

                5. Unquestionably, there were completed guns in the plant. We just don't know what happened to all of them but it seems reasonable to assume that many of the crates were removed intact and that would leave uncompleted guns for most of the GI's to have available.

                6. How many Walther factory workers have you talked to? I haven't spoken to any but I would be interested to hear what they had to say if you have conversed with one or more. That would be very interesting information to have.

                7. Buxton states that each component line was ALLOWED to produce parts at a different rate, not ORDERED to. See page 188, Vol. I.

                In closing, there have been no reported "c" block mismatches that originated in Europe or coming in from Russia. European collectors have to import them from the US to get an example. That would seem to indicate that GIs were virtually the only ones that got those.

                Buxton mentions frames in the "e" block were apparently found in the plant. That is so far beyond the production limits of the other components that it seems unlikely. There is no way to tell an "e" block ac45 frame from a "e" block ac44 frame. So, the "e" block frames could have just been parts that were rejected from earlier production.

                If the Germans were so desperate for P.38s that they would accept mismatched guns, why don't we see a lot of mismatched Mausers and Spreewerks?

                Thanks for your analysis but perhaps what I have stated sheds a little different light on the subject.

                Best Regards, Leon
                Last edited by leondes; 06-16-2004, 11:26 AM.

                Comment


                  #23
                  Leon,

                  You bring up some good points. Besides the points I mentioned above, here is some more food for though!

                  1. You ask, "how many factory workers have I talked to?" Well, to be honest, none! But in 60 years we've never heard anything from them about making these pistols! If they did, wouldn't you think Buxton, or someone else would have found out from some surviving factory workers??? I think so!
                  Perhaps some of our European friends, can try and locate any surviving factory workers today, and find out?! That would certainly prove that story true or false then!

                  2. Even though I haven't talked to any factory workers, I have spoken to a veteran who "liberated" the Walther factory. He told me that there were tons of wooden cases filled with complete pistols there! I asked him if they were all P38, or PP, or PPK, or what? He didn't even know the difference between a P38, PP, or PPk. Therefore you story that US GIs knew how to assemble these guns by thier familiarity with them in combat is bogus! They didn't even know what P38 was!? All GIs knew what a luger was! Any other pistol was just a pistol to them. The P38 did not carry the legacy that it has today back in 1945!

                  3. You mentioned about mismatches from Spreewerk or Mauser. Well, first off, let's look at Walther. We know about the MM P38s already. We also know about MM PP pistols as well. I have also seen several PP pistols that have no serial numbers on them at all, and are only marked with the "AC" on the slide!
                  Yet, I haven't observed a factory MM Walther PPk yet? or K43? Why? If GIs (or factory workers) could assemble a P38 or PP, surely they could assemble a PPk, or K43, or Stg44 right?

                  3b. As for Mauser, No I haven't seen any MM P38s from them. However, I have seen factory MM Masuer HSc. I have also seen a "last ditch" HSc that had no serial numbers on it at all, yet it had the "eagle/N", and "eagle/WaA135" on it!? How do you explain this?

                  3c. As for Spreewerk, by 1945, there was so much confusion on P38 serial numbers. There is the zero series, a-prefix, b-prefix, c-prefix, double zero series, and then you have the "oddball" types that have "U" "R" or "F" proof markings instead of WaA numbers, and Buxtons' book even shows one with a five diget serial number?!

                  As you said, I guess well have to agree to disagree. One thing is for sure. At the end of the war, there was some serious mass confusion! I believe it was this confusion, along with the deteriorating war efforts that lead to some of these MM and/or "oddball" pistols.

                  Matt

                  Comment


                    #24
                    Hi Matt,

                    On your point about the one vet that you talked to being in the plant at the end, you are drawing an overall conclusion that NO GI knew the difference between a P.38 and other pistols based on the comments of one man.

                    I have personally talked to a couple of vets that did know what a P.38, PP and PPk were because they said they were bringing them back on the ship from Europe when they were ordered to only keep 1 pistol and threw the rest overboard and they told me what they threw over.

                    I also mentioned that I didn't think that GI assembled guns were a factor, my comment was only in passing. Certainly some GIs carried P.38s as a side arm or souvenier at least until they thought they would be captured then they were discarded.

                    As far as your HSc WaA stamped without a serial number, I am certainly not going to try to explain every odd gun that comes down the pike. They have nothing to do with regular mass production. I have a few odd ones myself but I don't base my opinion about other production based on them.

                    I'm not sure what confusion you are talking about with the Spreewerks. They do have matching numbers even to the end as far as I know.

                    What five digit serial number Spreewerk are you referring to?

                    Regards, Leon

                    Comment


                      #25
                      Leon,

                      I'm sure there were a few vets that did know what a P38 was. However, if you asked 100 vets to point out a P38 in a lineup of German pistols, I would bet 70% (or more) would not be able to! IF you asked them to point out a luger, I bet 90% (or more) would be able to do so!

                      I seriously wasn't asking you to explain the "oddballs" from Mauser and Spreewerk. I don't think anyone could. They are simply termed, "Last ditch" pisotls. I was just pointing them out, since in your previous statement, you mentioned that you haven't seen any MM Mauser or Spreewerk pistols (I know you were talking about P38s, but I just wanted to point out the other pistols)
                      Also, you didn't explain anything about the MM PP pistols and the lack of MM PPk, K43, and Stg44s?

                      The confusion at Spreewerk is not totally in the serial numbering, but all the changing of the maker codes, and proof markings, or lack there of! (I know you are an extensively knowledgeable P38 collector. Probably know much more than myself, so I won't bore you with all the details), but I'm sure you know about the "U" proof, the "double zero series", "cvq" code change", and also the "oddball" markings such as "F" "M", or "R" marked on the slides of Spreewerk P38s.

                      The five diget serial number I was referring to is in Buxtons' Vol. II. It is serial number "10000f". I may be wrong on the serial number, but I beleive it was a late war Spreewerk.

                      Anyways, we're really getting off the original subject here! If you would like to discuss this further, just give me a call, or send me an email. I love talkin' P38s and holsters with you Leon! We should really try to get together sometime! I'll send you a message!

                      Matt

                      Comment


                        #26
                        Hi Matt,

                        Spreewerk serial number 10000f? So you were referring to this gun.

                        http://lmd-militaria.com/page46.html

                        I would like to talk to you sometime. Email me your phone number as I can make unlimited long distance calls at no additional charge on my bill. Also let me know what time of day you might be able to talk.

                        leon.des@gte.net

                        Regards, Leon

                        Comment

                        Users Viewing this Thread

                        Collapse

                        There are currently 2 users online. 0 members and 2 guests.

                        Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                        Working...
                        X