Vintage Productions

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Army Officer for Review

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Army Officer for Review

    Hello all, I'm looking to get some opinions on an officer's dagger. Unmarked blade. With portepee and scabbard. I know the unmarked blades are of some contention some times. As always, any opinions would be greatly appreciated!
    Attached Files

    #2
    1
    Attached Files

    Comment


      #3
      2
      Attached Files

      Comment


        #4
        These Heer dagger looks like late unmarked type, produced by Anton Wingen Solingen.
        Unfortunately blade is cleaned, and the scabbard is replaced.
        Portepee is original.

        Schlange

        http://www.mojalbum.com/schlange88/albumi
        Last edited by Schlange; 12-17-2014, 02:58 AM.

        Comment


          #5
          Thanks for the reply! Curious why you think the scabbard was replaced? So you're saying it's not an original scabbard or it's just not matching to the dagger? Also blade doesn't look brand new, still some wear/grime on it so not sure why you think it's been cleaned? There are obviously many out there with blades much cleaner and shinier than this one. Just curious why you are thinking those things. Vielen Dank!

          Comment


            #6
            The answer "might be" and Mr. Schlange can help me out as well. Is that the pommel, crossguard and scabbard usually/should share the same patina. It appears IMHO, that this might be a classic "parts dagger". All original parts from different manufactures put together post war. Unfortunately not a uncommon practice. Such a shame!! I actually just ran downstairs to look at all 4 of my Eickhorn army daggers, vet purchased, and ALL share the same patina with the exception of my "over the shoulder" makers mark which all parts stated above are aluminum I think.
            Not much patina on that one, or I got just plane lucky. Hope this helps, if anything I've stated above is incorrect, please chime in. I am newer collector and you NEVER stop learning in this hobby!!

            Comment


              #7
              IMO dagger is fine, nothing wrong with scabbard, blade just showing it's age.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Schlange View Post
                These Heer dagger looks like late unmarked type, produced by Anton Wingen Solingen.
                Unfortunately blade is cleaned, and the scabbard is replaced.
                Portepee is original.

                Schlange
                Anton Wingen never used this crossguard. I will agree the finish seems to differ between the scabbard and hilt.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Always a good sign when scabbard and hilt share the same tone of patina.

                  I'd like to see an aluminum hilt Eickhorn with the over the shoulder mark. That's a first for me

                  Frank

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by fdodge View Post
                    Always a good sign when scabbard and hilt share the same tone of patina.

                    I'd like to see an aluminum hilt Eickhorn with the over the shoulder mark. That's a first for me

                    Frank
                    Frank Me To ! Eickhorn did make an aluminum hilt & scabbard dagger but it was early in the period.

                    Comment

                    Users Viewing this Thread

                    Collapse

                    There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.

                    Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                    Working...
                    X