Cav & Panzer: minty vs. salty

[Albert]

Dear All,

Could also add to the title "attributed vs. non.attributed"... Anyway, I could never side with one position or the opposite on polls asking the preference. Both mint pieces and pieces with hones field wear have their appeal for me. Here is a quick comparison of mint and unattributed and field worn and attributed . Now how could one make a pick

BR,
Albert

[Albert]

A Cav private purchase visor and a Pz. Off. side cap. GAB made visor is anonymous, the c-cap is I believe attributed:

[Albert]

And a pair a field worn counterparts both from one individual:

[Albert]

Insignia on visor:

[Albert]

Side view:

[Albert]

Side view 2:

[Albert]

Top:

[Albert]

Inside 1:

[Albert]

Inside 2:

[BenVK]

Lovely alter art cav cap you have there, I prefer them all beat up.
The sidecaps are interesting, they look identical apart from the difference in condition. You sure it's not the same cap that you cleaned afterwards?!

[Albert]

...The sidecaps are interesting, they look identical apart from the difference in condition. You sure it's not the same cap that you cleaned afterwards?!

Well, frankly speaking it's the other way around

[Albert]

Total view of inside:

[Albert]

Maker Erwin Friedemann of Berlin:

[Albert]

Turning to the side cap; close up of insignia:

[Albert]

Side 1: