**nurnberg awards ** ????

[bastogne]

Members
I just picked these up and got the thumbs up from a few people
What do you guys think …thanks for the help

[bastogne]

xXXXXxxx

x

[bastogne]

xxXXXxxx

xx

[bastogne]

questions

q

[Max_Porter]

Hello,

both are fine originals in my opinion. Like them very much.


Best Regards

Max_Porter

[ErichS]

Agree, both are original.

[Military]

The details seem soft on the 1929 non-portable, including the stamping on the reverse?

Mil

[ErichS]

The details seem soft on the 1929 non-portable, including the stamping on the reverse?

Mil

It's a good one.

[Military]

Hi Erich,

I stand corrected if it is a good one, but I remember a discussion a while back about the stamping on the reverse. Here's mine which doesn't look like the one being discussed.

Cheers,
Mil

[Military]

And a few more which was vetted as good ones on the forum. Notice how different the MM stamping is? It could be a variation.

Mil

[Military]

And for comparison ...

[Military]

... and also as discussed with the "Neiman" variant:
http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru...highlight=1929

Cheers,
Mil

[Bob Hritz]

I am with Mil on this example. Odd hallnmark, lack of a flat back, and weak detail are just too much for me to like this.

Bob Hritz

[TimC]

3 yeas, 2 nays: not cool.

That would **** in my Easter basket for sure.

[der-hase-fee]

I am with Mil on this example. Odd hallnmark, lack of a flat back, and weak detail are just too much for me to like this.

Bob Hritz

Me, too. Looks like a cast copy.