nssk crush helmet eagle

[klasterix71]

hello
i bought this eagle here on waf and recive email on other forum that one is fake
si i need your opinions gent
thank in advance

[klasterix71]

backside

[wilhelm Saris]

Maybe others have an other opinion, but for me the manufacturing seems
much too crude, to be an Original.

[Erich B.]

I would agree. What I can't tell from these photos is whether or not the eagle shows corrosion that was subsequently wire-brushed and then painted over. If that is the case, it could be original in poor condition.
Erich

[klasterix71]

eagle was Black of patina and i wash it in vinegar

[Military]

It's probably a cast piece, not good.

Mil

[RonR]

A good one for comparison (missing top prongs)....


.....

[DALE ELLIS]

I would not want the first eagle in my collection.

[Mike TM]

I would say, not good

Mike

[Military]

Very nice piece, Ron. Thanks for sharing.

Mil

[Anzel]

Here is the original photos!
I owned this original but worn item! It looks like it was sanded down by the new owner. What a shame,

[Anzel]

Here is the rzm mark.,,

Unfortunately, this has been cleaned aggressively and is clearly ruined in my opinion.

[klasterix71]

i find traces of rzm sign
this is same eagle
i didnt brush it i just wash it 15 min in salad vinegar
so gents if is Black patina eagle from Anzel original then you must declare my above as a original
regards Zeljko

[Anzel]

With all due respect, you need to take clear photos and post. This NSKK Eagle was on estand for almost a month with hundreds of views. No one had any concerns with it. Your photos show that all black paint was removed on NSKK “banner” and all the patina was removed through out. This is not the same item or condition I mailed to you.
Why don’t you take clear photos of front and back and post on this thread as oppose to out of focus ones?

Glad I saved the photos of it.

[ironfist]

agree

the first one is just NASTY