Ahnenerbe Wolfram Siever's signature

[Michael Fay]

Does anyone have an example of Wolfram Sievers signature to compare with this one?
And does any one have examples of Ahnenerbe documents to compare this with?
I have recieved some positive comments on this grouping , but of course, I wonder what others who know more than I may have to say.
I have already researched all that is written within the docs. I know who Dr. Fehrle was and exactly what the documents are talking about, and why.

Thank you for any help as to this doc. grouping.
--Michael F.

[Michael Fay]

ahnenerbe

2nd page Ahnenerbe

[Michael Fay]

ahnenerbe

ahnenerbe p.3

[Michael Fay]

ahnenerbe

ahnenerbe p.5

[Michael Fay]

ahnenerbe

there are 2 more docs but I cant resize them at this time.
So any experts who know Ahnenerbe documents?
Thanks, Michael F.

[max history]

I have a few examples of the signature of Sievers, but they are not easily accessible. From memory, I can confirm that war dated examples are signed with a runic "S" at the beginning and end of his surname signature.
The other documents in your group appear to be genuine. However, your Sievers signature does not look natural and is a little hesitant from the scan you have posted. It does not appear to have the flow of a natural signature, appearing a little laboured. It's possible it's just the scan. As I have always said, the only true way of authenticating a signature is physical examination, but possibly a good close-up of your example might help. Until then, I would be inclined to reserve judgement.
Max.

[Michael Fay]

signature

To Max History, thank you for your input, I hoped you would look at this. I will put up various digital camera pix I just took(instead of using my scanner as before) in different light and angles. Anyone else's ideas are welcome too.
---MF

[Michael Fay]

sievers sig

another in less light

[Michael Fay]

sievers sig

diff. distance but very clear shot

[Michael Fay]

siever's sig

full doc at distance

[Michael Fay]

siever sig

side angle

[Michael Fay]

siever sig

again a shot

[Michael Fay]

siever's sig

lower shot

[Michael Fay]

sievers doc

full paper at distance

[derek]

I find it virtually impossible to tell from photographs whether things are good or bad unless it's patently obvious but as a tool for you to gauge the quality of your signature in the light of Max's comments above, here is an example of Sievers's signature from 1938. I will try and find one closer to the date of yours.
Derek