I noticed the paint is darker, but that could be just another variation since these were non official devises. I have never seen a gilded devise. I really don't think we have enough proven originals to compare your example with. I am attaching another pair from the Noss collection.
Sorry, but the scan came out blurred and too large.
Thanks Bill. Since all of the original examples that I have seen have the light-blue color and are constructed out of a grey metal, I will pass on these shoulderboards.
I'm not sure if there is any definitive reference to help the collector determine what a real S grad Cross is supposed to look like. In the Bender books on Medals they comment that 3 variations of the cross may have existed. The one you show certainly looks like most known originals except for the coloring. Most repros do not have the detail of the one in the pic you show. Of course I would be interested in seeing posts of repros to compare. I posted a topic on this subject on another forum. Heres the link if you are interested.Jim
I have absolutely no knowledge of this item, but from a photographic standpoint, keep in mind that depending on camera angle, lighting used, and any post-picture enhancement to bring out details, these could have slightly different tones and appearances.
Speculation could also say manufacturer and wear differences as well.
Yuri, the blue looks too dark in the first photograph if the pic is true to the board. I don't have any of these, unfortunately ( ), however, Dave Suter does. If he misses this thread, you might e-mail and have him give it a look.
AUTHOR OF:
sigpic
GERMAN ARMY SHOULDER STRAPS AND BOARDS - 1933-1945
To my experience the original Stalingrad crosses should have the light blue color like the first one Mr.Stump posted.
Needles to say they are very rare devises.
Pieter.
Comment