Erich-
I agree that the detail on the third device is quite poor but I certainly don't believe it is from wear. The bar is actaully in very nice condition and I don't think one device would be much more worn than the other. I took a really close look at the devices and it definately appears that they have all been on the bar for the same amount of time. There does not appear to be any more wear, dirt etc. around one device compared to the other two. Perhaps the construction of the Memal device was done by someone totally different than the device for the Czech award. Or maybe they were produced in two different types of metal - one being much softer than another. I don't know.
Brian
I agree that the detail on the third device is quite poor but I certainly don't believe it is from wear. The bar is actaully in very nice condition and I don't think one device would be much more worn than the other. I took a really close look at the devices and it definately appears that they have all been on the bar for the same amount of time. There does not appear to be any more wear, dirt etc. around one device compared to the other two. Perhaps the construction of the Memal device was done by someone totally different than the device for the Czech award. Or maybe they were produced in two different types of metal - one being much softer than another. I don't know.
Brian
Comment