Sirs,
How you think, awards EK2 and EK1 are forged?
I think that rewarding with date 29.4.45, originally was for EK2,
presently corrected on EK1. From under inscription EK2, other record
made earlier is visible. In an inscription "EK1", figure I looks same "fresh",
as well as an inscription "EK2 Kl.Kdr.62.J.D.".
The mistake in number of a division is still admitted
(instead of "362", it is written "62").
What do you think of it?
Thank.
How you think, awards EK2 and EK1 are forged?
I think that rewarding with date 29.4.45, originally was for EK2,
presently corrected on EK1. From under inscription EK2, other record
made earlier is visible. In an inscription "EK1", figure I looks same "fresh",
as well as an inscription "EK2 Kl.Kdr.62.J.D.".
The mistake in number of a division is still admitted
(instead of "362", it is written "62").
What do you think of it?
Thank.
Comment