For what it's worth.
The engraving is mechanically indexed and spaced as would be correct for a pantagraph engraving. The font is typical of the type used with the pantagraph. Was the font without the runic SS correct during the war? I don't know but type writers used for wartime award documents had the runic SS font. Why not the same for the font used with pantagraphs?
The pin and 20 marking makes no sense at all IMO, field repaired or not. The inside edges on the beading that Peter refers to are sometimes found on later EKs made using the Gablonzer process.
Personally I don't doubt the sincerity of the story or the intergrity of the previous owners. But...... judging the piece alone, without the story andjust on it's own merits I remain skeptical as it seems to need too much explaining to justify it.
As Chris mentioned the award or the decoration is not really as important as the award document which shows the entitlement to pocess and wear a particular award.
Just some thoughts.
Tony
The engraving is mechanically indexed and spaced as would be correct for a pantagraph engraving. The font is typical of the type used with the pantagraph. Was the font without the runic SS correct during the war? I don't know but type writers used for wartime award documents had the runic SS font. Why not the same for the font used with pantagraphs?
The pin and 20 marking makes no sense at all IMO, field repaired or not. The inside edges on the beading that Peter refers to are sometimes found on later EKs made using the Gablonzer process.
Personally I don't doubt the sincerity of the story or the intergrity of the previous owners. But...... judging the piece alone, without the story andjust on it's own merits I remain skeptical as it seems to need too much explaining to justify it.
As Chris mentioned the award or the decoration is not really as important as the award document which shows the entitlement to pocess and wear a particular award.
Just some thoughts.
Tony
Comment