EK1 unmarked

[Andre Murti]

Please, what do you think about this EK??? Many thanks!

[Dez H]

Looks like an unmarked Souval EK1

[Chet Sowersby]

I agree with Dez. It has all the features attributed to a Souval cross.

Chet

[Andre Murti]

regards, Andre

[Andre Murti]

regards, Andre)))

[Hans N]

Yep, looks like a unmarked Souval.

[Andre Murti]

What do you think of risks on metal under a paint at figures? All many thanks.

[Andre Murti]

What do you think of risks on metal under a paint at figures? All many thanks.

[Frank Heukemes]

I guess nobody understands what you are asking here. At least I don´t.

[Hans N]

I guess nobody understands what you are asking here. At least I don´t.

Neither do i

[Andre Murti]

[

Hi Thread)))I have asked about strange strips on metal about date on an obverse part of a cross. That you think of them. They are well visible on the last scan. Similar I did not see. The cross is not similar with a new collor. Thanks)))

[MH184]

I think our new friend means the sort of semi scored parallel striation above the date.

Andre,

Don't worry about those line's, that's normal and can be found on lots of EK inner cores.


'Not similar with a new collor'......??? Try again on this bit Andre ??


Kind regards,

Marcus

[Peter Wiking]

Andre Murti.
The cross is a Souval. The problem: is it wartime production or postwar production?
The frames and/or tools from Souval was used after the war.
Here is a couple of 1957 "trial pattern" crosses from my collection. The one in the center i´m 100% sure is Souval, as it has the small dieflaw in the beading. That one comes from a Austrian veteran, who lived here in Norway. He served in a mountain unit.

Cheers.
Peter

[Andre Murti]

Thanks friends for consultation)))) Andre.