Fake Knight's Cross ?

[Dave Kane]

Let's liven this joint up a bit!

Which is the FAKE....1,2,3,4, or 5


ONE

Steve and Shane gave me a good idea!!! Those who know maybe should hold off a bit....

[Dave Kane]

Two

[Dave Kane]

Three

[Dave Kane]

Four

[Dave Kane]

Five

[WW1wingman]

at a guess..

at a guess one and two,the third appears by junker with cross hatch at terminal of cross..the dies destroyed towars the end of the war.
without measurements weights etc impossible to be certain..
regards
steve

[Airborne Nut]

I know nothing about RK's!!! Having said that I will be paying close attention to this thread to see what the experts have to say. From what I have read, I will reluctantly say teh I don't like #4. The Rim beading looks to be a little crude and the swastica is short and has rounded top edges. THe date looks to be distorted a bit?

Anyway I can't wait to see what the pro's have to say. THis is a leraning thread for me.

-SHane

[George Stimson]

Well, it's obviously -- Oh, that's right! I'm not allowed to play in these!

[Dietrich Maerz]

[jujuy]

Dave, don't move so much your camera, stop french coffee

[Gerd W.]

Hi!

IMO Nr. 4 is the fake! From the first view the ring and the swaz are here the keys.

Regards

Gerd

[Pascal H.]

I wonder why only one of them is a bit out of focus .........

Pascal

[Gerd Becker]

Don´t know much about RKs, but Nr 4 has just not the quality of the other four. Just a guess...

[Airborne Nut]

So "which one of these does not belong?"

-Shane

[tinmantis]

Well, I'm saying 4 too.
Based solely on the quality of the swas, and the ring.
But number 1 is just too fantastic to be true! And that's based on the low quality of my own collection of crosses!
regards
jon