Juncker EK1

[Rich G]

Hello all,


I'm sure this has been brought up before but as a refresher, is there any reason why there are so many L/12 marked EK1 yet none marked '2'?

(well, I don't recall any but maybe there are some out there?)


Also, from what I've seen here 'Juncker' seem to have had several types and combinations of frames/cores. Again, any speculation as to why?

Rich

[ben bijker]

Hi Rich,

can't answer your first question, but the second is not so hard.

Juncker ordered a lot of crosses from other manufacturers, and marked them L/12 (or had them marked)

[Rich G]

Ben,

So Juncker didn't make any, just ordered in parts or already assembled crosses?

Rich

[ben bijker]

No, sorry Rich.
I was a bit unclear.
As far as I know Juncker did make their own ek's, but ordered a lot of ek's, or parts from W&L, S&L and possible some other manufacturers as well.

[Rich G]

OK, Ben. I see what you're saying now. But strange no EK1 marked '2'? Maybe they didn't produce the EK1 for the PKZ, only for the LDO.

No theories out there?


Rich

[AFF96]

Aren't there unmarked Juncker EK I's that could have been produced for PKZ?
Greg

[ben bijker]

I really don't know why they didn't mark the crosses later on, I havne't seen any "2" marked ek1 ever (at least: not a real one with a real marking)

Greg : most likely they were unmarked, but why, I don't know.
They marked their KC's with a "2" as well..

[frankscholz]

[QUOTE=ben bijker;4140552]

I havne't seen any "2" marked ek1 ever (at least: not a real one with a real marking

QUOTE]


AGREE

[AFF96]

I really don't know why they didn't mark the crosses later on, I havne't seen any "2" marked ek1 ever (at least: not a real one with a real marking)

Greg : most likely they were unmarked, but why, I don't know.
They marked their KC's with a "2" as well..

Thanks Ben!
Greg