Hi,
Im having trouble placing this cross in the timeline.The core is magnetic but not of an S&L design.Maybe it was bought in from a maker who never got a licence to produce RK,s and sold off stock.Who knows.
The frame has a shallow dent row that would hardly be visible when the frosting was still on it.There is no bridging flaw between the 6&9 o,clock arms and no flaws running thru the beading.But what really throws me,is an area of worn beading to the top left of the 12 o,clock arm.Its the same on both sides.At what point would this have occured? I take it to be in the die itself and not as a result of polishing.
All sensible suggestions welcome.Cheers
Im having trouble placing this cross in the timeline.The core is magnetic but not of an S&L design.Maybe it was bought in from a maker who never got a licence to produce RK,s and sold off stock.Who knows.
The frame has a shallow dent row that would hardly be visible when the frosting was still on it.There is no bridging flaw between the 6&9 o,clock arms and no flaws running thru the beading.But what really throws me,is an area of worn beading to the top left of the 12 o,clock arm.Its the same on both sides.At what point would this have occured? I take it to be in the die itself and not as a result of polishing.
All sensible suggestions welcome.Cheers
Comment