unmarked envelop and EK II ?

[Ischak]

Did you guys saw unmarked EK II class with original envelope too unmarked ?
It is typical for some maker or ? I trust the seller.





Thanks for advices and opinions guys

[CMSgt]

Ek

Josef

Can you post a picture of the backside of the envelope? Close-up shots of the cross can help get identified also. Jim

[wvdparis2]

known fake packet !

[Ischak]

Josef

Can you post a picture of the backside of the envelope? Close-up shots of the cross can help get identified also. Jim

Can not obtain better photos. It is from seller on internet. Envelope is by his words without stamp. Thank you again for help

[Ischak]

known fake packet !

are you sure ?

[streptile]

known fake packet !

I think so, too. But interestingly, Detlev Niemann sold one of these last week, no cross included. Does he know something we do not?

[grueni1208]

EK II: Deumer
packet: well known fake

Regards

Daniel

[Ostarrichi997]

Agreed,

The packet is a copy.

[Ischak]

Thank you for opinions guys. I will pass this complet then. There are marked crosses from this maker which are more interesting for me..

[MH184]

I think so, too. But interestingly, Detlev Niemann sold one of these last week, no cross included. Does he know something we do not?

I'm afraid he doesn't on this occasion, as this is undeniably a fake.

I think they've just about fooled every collector at one time, including me a decade or so go. It is still one of the better fakes out there, the printing is very good; the designation too close to original variants and the paper so very convincing.


KR


Marcus