ek2 mm 8 mistaken fore mm 3 ????

[Montgomery Burns]

Hey Kay!

I've been going through my collection to see if I can match it up with any other cross.. My collection does not contain all makers though, pretty far from actually , but no real match what I can see.. The number design with the long top parts of the ones (1), the swaz and inner parts of the frame is what I've been looking at primarily.. I have to ask you, is that a big die flaw on the 6 o'clock arm, both front and back?

/F

jes it is

[Montgomery Burns]

If it is a die flaw, it does resemble a mm 123 cross shown here (post 57 and 58) IMO: http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru...&highlight=123

and i think to it is a mach fore mm 123,,,


amaising ,,a very scharp aie jou have there

thank jou fore the help
without jou i never wood found it ...

thanks

[Friedrich]

Well, thank you Kay.. This is the fun part of the hobby, when you're actually able to help someone.. Sorry it didn't turn out to be a Hofstadter though.. Would have been real nice if there was a cross that proved EK II:s were manufactured by that maker..

Anyone else got an opinion on 123 being the maker of this cross? Robert Pierce for instance?