Warning: session_start(): open(/var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74/sess_56f120d18984b03cdc7b8f9f60dc5d0ef0b874a748d27e60, O_RDWR) failed: No space left on device (28) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 Warning: session_start(): Failed to read session data: files (path: /var/cpanel/php/sessions/ea-php74) in /home/devwehrmacht/public_html/forums/includes/vb5/frontend/controller/page.php on line 71 EK 2 mm lazy 2 and 800 on frame opinions - Wehrmacht-Awards.com Militaria Forums
ScapiniMilitaria

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

EK 2 mm lazy 2 and 800 on frame opinions

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
    #1

    EK 2 mm lazy 2 and 800 on frame opinions

    Hi Guys:
    This the first I've seen and EK2 mm with a lazy 2 and 800 on the frame. Personally the cross looks good as far as I can see. Whats your opinions on this Cross real , fake , or whatever
    Attached Files
    Tags: None
    #2
    mmmmmmmmm!

    very interesting!!! very nice!!!

    Comment

      #3
      Hi Rick,

      almost every ek with this stamps I have seen so far, are "upgraded".
      The stamps have been added later.
      But you can only see that on pics under an angle, or when in hand.

      It MIGHT be a good one, but I am very wary of these ek's.
      Best regards,
      Ben

      Comment

        #4
        I would say YET ANOTHER '2' marked EK2 from Phillip Militaria....this one without the typical Juncker 'hump' where the ring is attached
        Last edited by Biro; 03-12-2007, 04:36 AM.

        Comment

          #5
          Rick,

          Here are some known original Juncker '2's...

          Robert
          Attached Files

          Comment

            #6
            ,
            Attached Files

            Comment

              #7
              Robert

              Are you 100% sure the Niemann EK2 above was described as '2' marked?

              Marshall

              Comment

                #8
                Originally posted by Biro View Post
                Robert

                Are you 100% sure the Niemann EK2 above was described as '2' marked?

                Marshall
                Marshall,

                You're absolutely right. I had this Detlev's 'typical Juncker' type in my Juncker folder, and posted it here by mistake. Disregard this second set of photos. It is NOT a known Juncker, but something else that has been presumed to be a Juncker because of the cross hatching on the inner beading. We're still doing research on this type. It's my fault for posting it here by mistake. Sorry you guys. The first ctoss is definately a Juncker, marked '2'.

                Thanks Marshall,

                Robert

                Comment

                  #9
                  Originally posted by ben bijker View Post
                  Hi Rick,

                  almost every ek with this stamps I have seen so far, are "upgraded".
                  The stamps have been added later.
                  But you can only see that on pics under an angle, or when in hand.

                  It MIGHT be a good one, but I am very wary of these ek's.
                  Best regards,
                  Ben
                  Hi!

                  I agree with Ben that almost every ek with this stamps are upgrated.
                  I always observe the updates of Phillip Militaria. In the last 4 updates there was 3 times this "lazy 2 EK 2". That is an aspect at the authenticity of these pieces which leaves doubts.
                  I won't have one of these pieces in my collection.

                  Regards
                  Andreas

                  Comment

                  Previous template Next

                  Users Viewing this Thread

                  Collapse

                  There are currently 2 users online. 0 members and 2 guests.

                  Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                  Working...
                  X