Tony,
I understand what you are saying and I certainly don't take it wrong.
I have not started this neither can I end it. Sometimes people just don't want to be named and I have to respect that. I do not know the owner of the set that is pictured in the book because of exactly the same reason.
You read the statement of Detlev and Pieter. Same thing.
And by the way, nothing would change the fact of the cross with the round corner and the lizard tails anyway. It's all a story and whether this is von Bock's cross or not is a question of believe anyway - from both sides.
Even if I could show you the pictures I would not have any proof whatsoever that this is really the set of von Bock. All I can say is that it is not the same PLM and not the same RK. From there on it's story telling.
This has nothing to do with secrecy but rather respecting the trust somebody is giving.
I'm sorry if I have confused the issue by respecting this trust. Will not happen again.
Dietrich
I understand what you are saying and I certainly don't take it wrong.
I have not started this neither can I end it. Sometimes people just don't want to be named and I have to respect that. I do not know the owner of the set that is pictured in the book because of exactly the same reason.
You read the statement of Detlev and Pieter. Same thing.
And by the way, nothing would change the fact of the cross with the round corner and the lizard tails anyway. It's all a story and whether this is von Bock's cross or not is a question of believe anyway - from both sides.
Even if I could show you the pictures I would not have any proof whatsoever that this is really the set of von Bock. All I can say is that it is not the same PLM and not the same RK. From there on it's story telling.
This has nothing to do with secrecy but rather respecting the trust somebody is giving.
I'm sorry if I have confused the issue by respecting this trust. Will not happen again.
Dietrich
Comment