Hello
I've just received these three 1914 EKs.
The EK1 is vaulted and has a small screwback to it, (should there be another disc under the screw part on mine or is this how they came ?). There are no maker or other markings on the cross, but the screw part has four stars and '800' on it. The cross itself also appears to have a high silver content.
One of the EK2s has 'WS' stamped on the ring while the other has a couple of marks and what appears to be the number '12' stamped onto it. The one marked 'WS' appears to have a high silver content.
The cores of both the EK1 and the EK2 marked '12' 'rattle' in their frames.
Can anyone say from the close in shot of the ring marked '12' who the maker amy be ? I'm not expecting to much given the photo and the nature of the marks, but someone may have seen this before.
Either way I like them. I have to say that they do look a lot better 'in the hand' than on these scans.
As always, any comments or opinions warmly welcomed.
Regards
David
I've just received these three 1914 EKs.
The EK1 is vaulted and has a small screwback to it, (should there be another disc under the screw part on mine or is this how they came ?). There are no maker or other markings on the cross, but the screw part has four stars and '800' on it. The cross itself also appears to have a high silver content.
One of the EK2s has 'WS' stamped on the ring while the other has a couple of marks and what appears to be the number '12' stamped onto it. The one marked 'WS' appears to have a high silver content.
The cores of both the EK1 and the EK2 marked '12' 'rattle' in their frames.
Can anyone say from the close in shot of the ring marked '12' who the maker amy be ? I'm not expecting to much given the photo and the nature of the marks, but someone may have seen this before.
Either way I like them. I have to say that they do look a lot better 'in the hand' than on these scans.
As always, any comments or opinions warmly welcomed.
Regards
David
Comment