griffinmilitaria

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Review of APB Chapter of Tuckers Book

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Review of APB Chapter of Tuckers Book

    Review of the Army Paratrooper Badge chapter in the recent Tucker / Previtera book on Military Badges of the Third Reich.

    I am going to try to look at this in two ( 2 ) sections. The first regarding the images, the second regarding the content of the text.

    1. IMAGES

    1a. Omissions.

    1st pattern badge in aluminum (cut out talon)
    1st pattern badge in aluminum (reinforced talon)
    FIK pattern badge in 800 silver
    FIB pattern badge in 800 silver
    1943 pattern badge in feldgrau cloth

    1b. Present Images

    2nd pattern badge in aluminum / marked (reproduction)
    2nd pattern badge in aluminum / unmarked (reproduction)
    1943 pattern badge in feinzink (original)
    1938 pattern badge in bluegreen cloth (original)
    Case marked “Heeres = Fallschirmspringer Abzeichen” (reproduction)

    2. TEXT

    • On the first page of the chapter, after correctly stating that the FIB was incorporated into the Luftwaffe, the text goes on to say that, after the transfer “some of them still wore their army qualification badges with pride”. This statement could perhaps be misleading. In fact ALL former members of the FIK/FIB wore their original issue army badges until they were officially awarded the Luftwaffe badge on December 18, 1943. Even after being awarded the Luftwaffe version of the badge, very few chose to wear it in place of their army badge.

    • The book mentions that the “beard” (under the Wehrmachtadler’s beak) and the “rearward pointing claw” are “traits in determining authenticity” .This again could be very misleading. For one thing, many reproductions produced over the last two decades include both of these features, and some original badges, the 1st pattern in aluminum and both the 1st and 2nd pattern silver badges, did not have “beards”, with the anomalous exception of one 1st pattern (full cut out talon) badge recently found that had its “beard” only partially tooled away.

    • The book states that “holes were drilled in the reverse of the wreaths to secure the catch“. This is true of fakes such as the ones pictured but simply untrue of original badges. In fact the “C” form catches on original badges were soldered directly to the reverse of the wreathes of aluminum and silver badges, and soldered to a round plate soldered in turn to the reverse of the wreath in the case of the 1943 feinzink badges.

    “Aluminum badges may have been manufactured through 1941 as replacements” , “Zinc badges may have been produced prior to 1943 as replacements” These statements are certainly meant to leave the door open to an argument that would support the existence of odd, unusual, and non-conformance badges. I would though, be interested to hear exactly what the evidence is that would support either of these two statements.

    • The author correctly mentions that badges in 800 silver were 1. "private purchase" (Queen/Keating “Silver Badges” paragraph one, line one) and that 2. "Since few were willing to pay for these badges, army paratrooper badges made from silver are extremely rare" (Queen/Keating “Silver Badges” paragraph two, line three). Unfortunately though he mentions only that they were made from the same dies as the first pattern aluminum badge. He doesn’t mention which first pattern (the reinforced talon) and he doesn’t mention that the badge was also produced for the FIB using the second pattern dies (but with the “beard” tooled out, etc.etc.)

    • The presentation case for the badge. There was no such thing as the “Heeres = Fallschirmspringer Abzeichen” The prewar cases for the badges in aluminum (as the pictured case purports to be (dated 1938) ) were marked simply “Fallschirmschutzen = Abzeichen” or just “Fallschirmschutzen”. This just would not have existed pre war. At that time the badge did not even have an official “Heer” designation. Although in soldbuchs (which were first issued to army paratroopers on Sept. 2, 1939) you will see cases where the word "Heer' exists in parentheses (Heer) after the word Fallschirmschuetzenabzeichen, but this was not official until the June 1, 1943 reinstatement which renamed the badge “Fallschirmschuetzenabzeichen des Heeres” You will notice even on the official Verleihungsurkunde for the badge, it says simply Fallschirmschuetzenabzeichen.

    #2
    I would like to state also for the record that the above observations are my opinions which may or may not be shared by the site administrator or the other moderators. As we all know, it is very difficult to draw absolutes in this hobby. In many cases the best we can do is venture an educated guess based on the evidence before us. My comments are conclusions based on the evidence I have seen. To me the evidence is quite convincing, to others it may be less so.

    One addition to what I have written above, is (as others have already observed) Stephen Previtera certainly did a first class job with the layout and presentation of the book.

    My comments are meant in a constructive manner. I hope they will be the catalyst to some people delving deeper into this subject and looking at what has been written from a slightly different perspective.

    If I may be allowed to step slightly off of topic just for a moment, I would like to add just one additional personal thought which is important to me. We spend so much time discussing, analizing and even debating these pieces, which I certainly understand. But I truly hope we dont ever lose site of what (to me) is really important here, which is the history behind them and the people who earned the right to wear them. They cannot be forgotten in all this.

    I guess I have been quite zealous in my defence of the article by Prosper and myself and in the condemnation of pieces I feel have no connection to the men of the Fallschirm Infanterie. I hope everyone understands why. Its not to prove I am right, and others are wrong for the sake of doing so. Its to ensure that those who are interested in the history of these people, and are willing to make the substantial investment required to own one of these pieces, are equipted with the tools needed to make an educated decision and acquire a piece that was actually awarded to and worn by one of Germanys finest.

    I don't want to be "preachy" here, just wanted to share my thoughts. To me its all about the history, and its all about these people who earned the right to wear the badge.

    For those who are gone now.... UNVERGESSEN

    Eric Queen
    Last edited by Eric Queen; 11-05-2002, 10:46 PM.

    Comment


      #3
      Bravo! An open mind.

      Comment

      Users Viewing this Thread

      Collapse

      There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.

      Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

      Working...
      X