EK2 frame 1939 cross 1914

[kid74]

Please opinions&

WR Kirill

[Douglas 5]

Trevor probably can give you an answer to that one .

Douglas

[kid74]

more pictures &&& and waiting Trevor!

The cross was not disassemble&

WR Kirill

[kasia]

Hi its just a WW2 produced 1914 EK2

[dirtfisherrob]

(Made for) Veterans example?

[kid74]

Hi its just a WW2 produced 1914 EK2

it's not type of EK2 1914, it's real 1914s core with real 1939s frame&

WR Kirill

[kid74]

Masters, No one idea?

WR Kirill

[Douglas 5]

Kirill - post it in the Imperial section and see what they say about it .

Douglas

[kid74]

Kirill - post it in the Imperial section and see what they say about it .

Douglas

Do you think this best way for truth? ) Ok!

WR Kirill

[Ludwig]

IMO it´s nothing strange about that. The producers of Third Reich awards in many cases also produced WW1 awards as WW1 awards were still in use during the Third Reich. I can see no reason to have one frame for 1914 ICs and another for 1939 ICs.

[Douglas 5]

Because of the core .... that is where I posted all of mine .

Douglas

[Douglas 5]

Well Ludwig .... as described in the Deschler book -- just the opposite . All attemps were made to make sure there were significant differences between the WW1 EK and WW2 EK .
Some WW1 makers did use post September 39 their Schinkel frames until they had new dies made up .

Douglas

[Ludwig]

Does not sound very economic or logic to me... I mean, the cores are so very different already, why must the frames be different?

[Oberst Rudel]

Hi this one is an example of the Ek2 WWi made in the 3er Reich era, was normally made for reposition to the WWI soldiers thats lost or broke his ones, br Oberst.

[Douglas 5]

A more dominant appearance and stronger features than the Imperial version -- in the frame layout . 2 changes were made before settling a final version .

Douglas