1870 EK2's... genuine??

[Danny70]

Hello All,

I'd like to hear some opinions on these two crosses. Both are from a dealers site, and I'm interested in them although I'm afraid I'm not very well up on these to be certain about them. I hope some of you guys can help.

Cross A with 25 year oaks:

[Danny70]

And Cross B with 25 year oaks and 1914 spange:
(IMO the ninth bead looks a bit odd on this one, but I could be wrong).

Thanks in advance for any opinions.

Regards - Danny

[Don D.]

#2 is the ninth bead fake. Spange and oaks also bad. Not sure about #1.

[Danny70]

#2 is the ninth bead fake. Spange and oaks also bad. Not sure about #1.

Don,
I had a bad feeling about that one, thank you for confirming it for me.
Regards - Danny

[RAO]

#2 is the ninth bead fake. Spange and oaks also bad. Not sure about #1.

Yes, the cross in part 2 is a copy and for me the WHS also.

Regards Mike

[Kraal]

For me both okas look good, but #2 cross and clasp is fake, #1 is completly fine

[Danny70]

Thank you all for your help. I really appreciate it.

Regards - Danny

[VtwinVince]

I like the looks of the first one, but as already noted, the second is complete crap.