First of all, these crosses can be seen here http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru...d.php?t=235168
and here http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru...d.php?t=377545
Fact is that they come in a EKI and EKII version, both frames and cores match 100%, this is the only real facts we have at the moment imo.
They have been deemed Fake, Übergrösse and early Godet framed ones, but no proof yet. Could they be C F Zimmermann frames? At least Kai thinks so:
"EK 1.Klasse 1939, an Nadel, ohne Hersteller (jedoch typisches Stück des Hersteller "20" Zimmermann), Eisenkern, leicht getragener Zustand"
IF, and i say if, they are C F Zimmermann frames it means that we could have a C F Zimmermann assemblied EKII, so far none have been found marked.
The whole CFZ/Godet connection needs to be studied deeper. Hi-res pics of hardware, paint, numbers, swaz and beading is a must. The close connection between Godet and C F Zimmermann does not make it easier. So many theories and no real proof of who bought whos frames and cores and who really assemblied them. To me the maker of a cross is the one who made the core and frames and put them together, not the one who sold them and possibly marked them as their own.
and here http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru...d.php?t=377545
Fact is that they come in a EKI and EKII version, both frames and cores match 100%, this is the only real facts we have at the moment imo.
They have been deemed Fake, Übergrösse and early Godet framed ones, but no proof yet. Could they be C F Zimmermann frames? At least Kai thinks so:
"EK 1.Klasse 1939, an Nadel, ohne Hersteller (jedoch typisches Stück des Hersteller "20" Zimmermann), Eisenkern, leicht getragener Zustand"
IF, and i say if, they are C F Zimmermann frames it means that we could have a C F Zimmermann assemblied EKII, so far none have been found marked.
The whole CFZ/Godet connection needs to be studied deeper. Hi-res pics of hardware, paint, numbers, swaz and beading is a must. The close connection between Godet and C F Zimmermann does not make it easier. So many theories and no real proof of who bought whos frames and cores and who really assemblied them. To me the maker of a cross is the one who made the core and frames and put them together, not the one who sold them and possibly marked them as their own.
Comment