DKiG cloth

[Mike TM]

Hello, what do you think about this piece. The date "1941" lacks of detail. What do you think?

The link:
http://www.original-militaria.com/ca...productId=1060

thanks
Mike

[David R.]

Other than being over priced I think It's good. It does lack detail but that's not uncommon with these. IMO
David R.

[Nico C]

Genuine cross



Nico

[Calvin Hall]

Not quite as original as the website's name might imply.

A POS fake.

[Nico C]

Not quite as original as the website's name might imply.

A POS fake.

Sure?
Looks original although to me.

Please explain why.

[all1knew]

Hello,

This is a complete reproduction and coming from the source does not shock me.

Basically, it is the same cross:

http://dev.wehrmacht-awards.com/foru...d.php?t=257145

William Kramer

[Nico C]

This for sure could have fooled me
I need to look out when purchasing one...

[Calvin Hall]

Nico -

This cross lacks several features that are found in genuine crosses...

First, the wreath is not what would be expected from an original.

The starburst motif on the exterior of the wreath is not what one would expect.

The weave/texture of the white interior is incorrect.

[Pierre]

Almost impossible to read "1941" on this DKiG which is the first read flag. You don't need to go further. It is an absolutely real piece of crap.

Pierre

[IVAN]

Hi,
IMO cross is not original.
Ivan