GeneralAssaultMilitaria

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Classification of Auxiliary Cruiser Badges based on obverse design

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Classification of Auxiliary Cruiser Badges based on obverse design

    Time for another classification thread — this time for the highly coveted Auxiliary Cruiser Badge.

    Announced by Großadmiral Erich Raeder on April 24, 1941, the Kriegsabzeichen für Hilfskreuzer was the fourth Kriegsmarine service badge to be introduced (omitting the Blockade Breaker badge for now since it was a civilian award and approved for navy personnel only later in December, 1942). There had been an 8 month hiatus between the release of the Minesweeper badge in 1940 and the quick flurry of new badge announcements in 1941 between April and June.

    Although announced on April 24, that announcement wasn’t published in Uniformen-Markt until June 1st in the same article announcing the Fleet badge (which had been instituted by Raeder on April 30). At the time it was stated: “Die Entwürfe zu den beiden vorstehend geschilderten Kriegsabzeichen sind, wie wir hören, fertig, aber die Muster noch nicht.
    “The designs of the two above-mentioned war badges are, as we hear, complete, but the samples are not yet ready.”

    That design was by Wilhelm Ernst Peekhaus, a Berlin artist who would also design the S-Boat badge (1st and 2nd pattern) and later the U-Boat clasp. A photograph of the badge was finally shown in Uniformen-Markt on October 1, 1941, along with the other newly released S-Boat and Fleet badges.

    Although the style is in keeping with the usual Kriegsmarine war badges to that point, it has some unique features which lend it an air of grandeur over previous badges. Given that Auxiliary Cruisers were converted merchant ships with a variety of appearances, rather than faithfully reproducing a navy ship the design instead features a romanticized Viking raider ship to evoke the action of this branch of the navy, dramatically portrayed spanning the globe. The height is 3 mm taller than the Minesweeper and Destroyer badges and also the oakleaves and acorns are rendered in a larger format with one fewer leaf on each side, giving the wreath a more robust look.

    Whereas we usually see the products of C. Schwerin & Sohn in the first published images of new badges in Uniformen-Markt, this time we see the image of a C.E. Juncker badge, probably meaning that Juncker got the first production contract for the AC badge while Schwerin produced the Fleet and S-Boat badges shown in the same press release.

    There are 12 makers of the S-Boat badge known to date, and these 12 makers can be grouped into 7 categories by obverse design. As with the Fleet badge, there is good consistency in the design between most makers so that the defining features for the categories are somewhat subtle, but the images will highlight the differences.

    First I’ll define the 7 categories, following which I’ll post the eagles and globes for each manufacturer within each group for visual reference. Finally, a summary table will be presented which assigns an “Auxiliary Cruiser Classification Number” (AC#) to each of 36 variants.

    Thanks are due, in advance, to all the collectors who have posted their badge photos over the years from which these compilations could be made, and especially to Martin and Hubert for the many postings from their outstanding collections.
    Attached Files
    Last edited by Norm F; 01-30-2017, 01:24 PM.

    #2
    The 7 basic categories

    First, the 7 basic categories:

    Type 1: “Schwerin”
    Type 2: “Juncker-design”
    Type 3: “S&L”
    Type 4: "Deumer-style"
    Type 5: “Pforzheim-design”
    Type 6: “Pforzheim-like”
    Type 7: “Japanese”
    Attached Files
    Last edited by Norm F; 01-30-2017, 01:26 PM.

    Comment


      #3
      The 12 makers by category

      Next, here is a list of the 12 makers of the Auxiliary Cruiser Badge by category. 5 makers made a Tombak version (1 of which also produced in zinc and 1 in silver) and 7 makers produced zinc-only versions.

      Type 1: “Schwerin”

      C. Schwerin & Sohn, Berlin (Tombak and zinc) - marked

      Type 2: “Juncker-design”

      C.E. Juncker, Berlin (Tombak only) - marked and unmarked
      Paul Meybauer, Berlin (Tombak only) - attributed

      Type 3: “S&L”

      Steinhauer & Lück, Lüdenscheid (zinc only) - attributed

      Type 4: “Deumer-style”

      Wilhelm Deumer, Lüdenscheid (zinc only) - attributed

      Type 5: “Pforzheim-design”

      Otto Schickle, Pforzheim (Tombak only) - attributed
      B.H. Mayer, Pforzheim (zinc only) - marked
      Foerster & Barth, Pforzheim (zinc only) - marked and unmarked
      Friedrich Orth, Vienna (zinc only) - marked

      Type 6: “Prorzheim-like”

      Rudolf Souval, Vienna (zinc) - marked
      Alois Rettenmaier, Schwäbisch-Gmund (zinc) - attributed

      Type 7: “Japanese”

      Anonymous maker, Yokohama (Tombak and silver) - unmarked or “STERLING” marked

      There are a number of significant features to differentiate these groups, but for simplicity I’ll focus on some prominent details in the eagles and globes for each maker.
      Last edited by Norm F; 07-10-2017, 12:29 PM.

      Comment


        #4
        Type 1: “Schwerin”

        Type 1: “Schwerin”

        Of all Kriegsmarine badges, the Schwerin Auxiliary Cruiser badge in Tombak is probably the most highly valued by the general collecting community. Although not rare, it is certainly much less common than the workhorse Juncker, combined with the fact that it is prominently maker marked and of the finest production quality. The Schwerin eagle is a striking Art Deco design with a powerful bearing that is unmatched in other AC badges. The styling of the globe is also unique both in material (aluminum) and in fine detail, incorporating a raised border to the coastline of the land masses.

        The almost square cutout on the top right between the pennant and the wreath is a recognizable feature that can be used to identify the Schwerin in wartimes photos of the badge in wear. The top of the “spear” held by the Viking sailor lacks any sharp point, more like a staff than a spear.
        Attached Files
        Last edited by Norm F; 01-30-2017, 01:29 PM.

        Comment


          #5
          Type 2: “Juncker-design”

          Type 2: “Juncker-design”

          Probably the primary badge to be ordered by the Kriegsmarine as official award pieces, the Juncker is the workhorse of Tombak Hilfskreuzer badges. Quality is still good, but since it was produced in higher numbers we see a decline in detail over time compared with the Tombak Schwerins. There is no zinc version.

          The eagle head has a very “Juncker-like” aesthetic when compared with other Juncker awards with a prominent brow and “circles” under the eyes. The Viking’s “spear” comes to a subtle point. The globe is Tombak with differently shaped land masses and less crisp detail than Schwerin’s aluminum globe, but similarly has a raised rim around the coastlines of the continents.

          Interestingly, the rare Meybauer-attributed badges show the same design as Juncker’s but with slight reworking of the details. There is a steeper cut to the ends of the wings and extensive hand finishing of the margins as well as the classic Meybauer feature of the cut-out swastika. The Tombak globe is virtually identical to Juncker’s, no doubt derived from the same die.
          Attached Files

          Comment


            #6
            Type 3: “S&L”

            Type 3: “S&L”

            The Type 3 design is unique to Steinhauer & Lück and is the type that is found on early post-war souvenir boards from Lüdenscheid.

            The S&L-attributed AC badge was produced only in zinc but still preserved the 2-piece construction with separate globe whereas subsequent badges in the classification system are one piece. The Viking’s “spear” is blunt like in the Schwerin but the eagle aesthetic is somewhat cartoonish by comparison with a simpler head and bulbous toes. The globe is somewhat similar to Juncker’s but lacks the raised rim to the shorelines and was produced in both Tombak and steel over time. The stippled land masses resemble the texture of pumice stone.
            Attached Files
            Last edited by Norm F; 01-30-2017, 01:32 PM.

            Comment


              #7
              The post-war globe in the S&L

              When it comes to the S&L, it's important to be aware of the flawed post-war globe in Tombak and also the differences in rivets -- two features used to differentiate post-war construction from "wartime-compatible" construction of this badge.

              These comparisons show the differences between wartime "Type 1" globes (in both Tombak and ferrous) and the post-war "Type 2" globe (in Tombak only). ["Type" in this context refers to the sub-types of globe, not the obverse design which in both cases is "Type 3 - S&L".]
              Attached Files

              Comment


                #8
                Type 3: “S&L” - continued

                Two other features worth mentioning about the S&L design:

                1) Whether accidental or by intention, this is the only badge design that exhibits rudimentary facial features on the tiny Viking sailor.

                2) And although not an obverse design feature, the S&L design is paired with the greatest variety of reverse hardware, showing six different reverse setups on the "wartime compatible" badges (that can also be found on a wide variety of other S&L-attributed badges).
                Attached Files

                Comment


                  #9
                  Type 4: “Deumer-style”

                  Type 4: “Deumer-style”

                  The only badge in this category is the rare two-piece Auxiliary Cruiser badge in zinc discussed in this thread: Unknown Hilfskreuzer, possibly Deumer
                  The styling, finish and choice of hardware are suggestive of Lüdenscheid production and Deumer in particular, hence the name of this category and its placement between S&L's two-piece design and the later one-piece Pforzheim design.

                  The design of the eagle's head is unique and intermediate in sophistication between the Type 2 (Juncker) and Type 3 (S&L). The Viking sailor has a broader chest and the "spear" comes to a gentle point. This is the only design to lack the "sail loop" between the dragon's neck and the Viking's spear. The non-ferrous globe has a different stippling pattern from the S&L and slight differences in the shapes of the land masses; the margins of the globe are meticulously matched to the contours of the wreath and it's bonded to the planchet in some manner without any visible rivet on the reverse.
                  Attached Files
                  Last edited by Norm F; 01-01-2017, 11:18 AM.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Type 5: “Pforzheim-design”

                    Type 5: “Pforzheim-design”

                    The first badge in this category is the rare Schickle-attributed Hilfskreuzer which is the only one-piece Auxiliary Cruiser badge to be produced in Tombak, all the others being zinc. The reverse hardware on this type is also seen on the other early Tombak Schickle-attributed KM awards. Their extreme rarity is attributed to the fact that Schickle was barred from the production of Third Reich awards after June 1941 which was only 2 months after the Auxiliary Cruiser badge was announced.

                    The eagle aesthetic can be considered on par with the Berlin Tombak badge makers, featuring a somewhat more angry expression on the eagle’s head and finely executed claws. The “spear” has a gently pointed end. The land masses on the globe are again without raised rims and the surface texture has a more "rippled" appearance compared with the stippling of other categories.

                    Not surprisingly, the same design is used by the members of the Liefergemeinschaft Pforzheim, B.H. Mayer and Foerster & Barth, although their versions are only in zinc, use hardware choices consistent with those makers’ other badges and are found LDO-number marked for the private purchase market. Friedrich Orth, over in Vienna, appears to have purchased a sister die for their version as well. As with other shared designs (like the 1st pattern S-Boat), one has to wonder if the Pforzheim die producer, Paul Wissman, was involved as a common supplier.
                    Attached Files
                    Last edited by Norm F; 01-01-2017, 10:36 AM.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Type 6: “Pforzheim-like”

                      Type 6: “Pforzheim-like”

                      This design is a variation on the Type 5 (hence the name "Pforzheim-like"), but there are enough changes to create a separate category. The eagle head is trimmed differently so that it looks somewhat more like a finch than an eagle. The feathering is sparse on the legs compared with the earlier categories so that more leg is seen exposed, especially on the Souval. The “spear” on the Souval is unique with its prominent arrow-head tip while the Rettenmaier-attributed version is unique for its larger acorns throughout the wreath. Both badges show a more stippled texture on the land masses of the globe compared with the “rippling” of Type 5.

                      They're close enough to the Type 5 makers that it's reasonable to postulate a shared source for the tooling, perhaps from later in the war.
                      Attached Files
                      Last edited by Norm F; 07-10-2017, 12:22 PM.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Type 7: “Japanese”

                        Type 7: “Japanese”

                        The famous (to collectors anyway) Japanese-made version is a unique work of art. Awarded to the crew members of the Thor and Michel when in Japan, the exotic obverse design is highly stylized yet rendered in fine detail. It was made in one piece in both Tombak and silver, the latter marked “STERLING”. Like the Type 1 and Type 2 designs, the continental land masses have a well-defined raised rim, perhaps a feature learned from a German badge provided to the designer. The globes of the Tombak and “early” silver versions were scored with latitude and longitude lines while the final silver variant was without scoring. (More can be seen here.)

                        They are instantly recognizable but, like all badges, have been targeted by fakers in recent years so knowledge and vigilance remain the collector’s best defense.
                        Attached Files
                        Last edited by Norm F; 01-30-2017, 12:47 PM.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Summary table

                          So there you have it, another badge classification to go with the others in the pinned thread.

                          12 manufacturers of the Auxiliary Cruiser badge, examples of which can be found in the database thread.
                          5 of the 11 were manufactured in Tombak (including the Japanese) of which only Schwerin produced in both Tombak and zinc (while the Japanese was in both Tombak and silver).
                          7 of the 11 were zinc-only makers.

                          So that makes 14 badges of Tombak, zinc or silver to collect, but then there are the variants in dies and setups to consider so that the collector never becomes bored. Currently, 37 such variants are included in the Classification Table presented here. The same rules apply as to my other classification tables, namely variations in finish and atypical “one-offs” are excluded as are the “French-made” badges which, even if made during wartime, as far as we can tell were neither sanctioned by the KM nor worn by sailors. As before, I’ve included a column which equates the new numbering system to examples shown in “The Kriegsmarine Awards” Volumes I and III.

                          All variants can be grouped into the 7 categories.
                          Attached Files
                          Last edited by Norm F; 11-25-2017, 10:06 AM. Reason: updated the classification table

                          Comment


                            #14
                            I am not much of a Kriegsmarine collector myself, but I enjoyed this very much ! I am just mind buggled by the amount of detail in your work Norm, Top notch quality in every way

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Well dine Norm!! My favorite Kriegsmarine Badge

                              Comment

                              Users Viewing this Thread

                              Collapse

                              There is currently 1 user online. 0 members and 1 guests.

                              Most users ever online was 10,032 at 08:13 PM on 09-28-2024.

                              Working...
                              X