Hello-
The lab at ISU is going to email me all the data regarding the analysis of the K&Q EK2s compared to the K&Q RK and lastly the only fake I could find, a honor roll clasp. The results were stunning to say the least. The lab has the images posted on their website as well, which I will provide a link to when I get the email. Here are a few of the short answers.
1. K&Q RK paint- the paint on the K&Q RK is a chemical match to the period paint from the EK2 K&Qs with highest peaks in Calcium and phosphorous, with trace metals which I will show in greater detail later with exact percentages. The % of Ca and P in the EK2s was a great match for the RK. Further, the thickness of the paint and application was similar with all crosses. The fake honor roll clasp with the modern black paint did not share the peak Ca and P levels, showing it clearly different than the period K&Q paint. I did not have a modern fake EK for comparison. Mathias Zimmer and Drew provided the EK2s.
2. Frame EK2s- both EK2s were silver plated with a neusilber frame. THe composition was Cu, Ni, and Zn as expected. The silver plating was unexpected. The elemental composition of neusilber in the EK2s was identical.
3. Frame RK- Here is a shocker- There is RHODIUM coating which accounts for the frosting, in contrast to previous views this was a myth. The rhodium coating is an alloy of silver/rhodium and is applied in a plated type fashion. The core of the frame is made of silver, which varies in composition up to 95% silver, depending on what part of the frame is viewed, suggesting a non-uniform distribution of the "800" silver alloy, or simply that the silver content of "800" is a minimum which may be greater than 80%.
The guy said he could easily determine wartime "800" silver vs a modern "800" silver by the % of trace elements and the distribution of the alloy, making this an effective means of evaluating the frame of the rounder for this silver content and appearance as well as the presence of the rhodium "frosting" (previously thought to be a myth, therefore if the rounder is fake, the fakers would not have applied a rhodium finish). I will get photos and all the data here as soon as I can, but the weather is bad here and of course there is that football game tonight!
The lab at ISU is going to email me all the data regarding the analysis of the K&Q EK2s compared to the K&Q RK and lastly the only fake I could find, a honor roll clasp. The results were stunning to say the least. The lab has the images posted on their website as well, which I will provide a link to when I get the email. Here are a few of the short answers.
1. K&Q RK paint- the paint on the K&Q RK is a chemical match to the period paint from the EK2 K&Qs with highest peaks in Calcium and phosphorous, with trace metals which I will show in greater detail later with exact percentages. The % of Ca and P in the EK2s was a great match for the RK. Further, the thickness of the paint and application was similar with all crosses. The fake honor roll clasp with the modern black paint did not share the peak Ca and P levels, showing it clearly different than the period K&Q paint. I did not have a modern fake EK for comparison. Mathias Zimmer and Drew provided the EK2s.
2. Frame EK2s- both EK2s were silver plated with a neusilber frame. THe composition was Cu, Ni, and Zn as expected. The silver plating was unexpected. The elemental composition of neusilber in the EK2s was identical.
3. Frame RK- Here is a shocker- There is RHODIUM coating which accounts for the frosting, in contrast to previous views this was a myth. The rhodium coating is an alloy of silver/rhodium and is applied in a plated type fashion. The core of the frame is made of silver, which varies in composition up to 95% silver, depending on what part of the frame is viewed, suggesting a non-uniform distribution of the "800" silver alloy, or simply that the silver content of "800" is a minimum which may be greater than 80%.
The guy said he could easily determine wartime "800" silver vs a modern "800" silver by the % of trace elements and the distribution of the alloy, making this an effective means of evaluating the frame of the rounder for this silver content and appearance as well as the presence of the rhodium "frosting" (previously thought to be a myth, therefore if the rounder is fake, the fakers would not have applied a rhodium finish). I will get photos and all the data here as soon as I can, but the weather is bad here and of course there is that football game tonight!
Comment